EBITDA vs. Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE): Which Should You Use?

Educational note: This article is general information for business owners, buyers, CPAs, attorneys, lenders, and advisors. It is not legal, tax, investment, or valuation advice for a specific situation. A professional business valuation or business appraisal depends on the valuation date, purpose, standard of value, premise of value, subject interest, governing documents, available evidence, and the appraiser’s scope of work.

1. Quick Answer: SDE for Owner-Operated Businesses, EBITDA for Transferable Enterprises

Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE) and EBITDA are both normalized earnings metrics, but they answer different valuation questions. SDE is usually most useful for a small, owner-operated business where one buyer expects to step into the seller’s operating role. EBITDA is usually more useful for a management-run company where the business must continue paying managers after a sale. Many private companies need both metrics, especially when a business is transitioning from “main street” owner-operator economics to lower-middle-market enterprise economics.

The difference matters because the chosen earnings metric affects the buyer universe, the valuation methods selected, the comparable transactions used in the market approach, and the adjustments required before the analyst can estimate value. Valuation standards emphasize a facts-and-circumstances process rather than a one-size-fits-all formula (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA], n.d.; International Valuation Standards Council [IVSC], 2024; The Appraisal Foundation, n.d.). A business appraisal should therefore explain why SDE, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, asset value, or another metric is most relevant for the assignment.

A practical rule is:

• Use SDE when the company is small, owner-operated, and a likely buyer will replace the seller’s labor personally.
• Use EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA when the company has paid management or must hire replacement management after closing.
• Use an SDE-to-EBITDA bridge when both buyer types are plausible or the company is evolving from owner-operated to management-run.
• Use discounted cash flow and other income approach methods when growth, working capital, capital expenditures, taxes, debt structure, or risk cannot be captured by a simple earnings multiple (CFA Institute, n.d.-a; Damodaran, n.d.).
• Use or reconcile with the asset approach when the company is asset-heavy, distressed, holding valuable non-operating assets, or generating weak earnings relative to its tangible asset base (AICPA, n.d.; IVSC, 2024).

The short answer is simple. The correct application is not. SDE and EBITDA are not values by themselves. They are inputs to a defensible business valuation process.

2. Definitions: What SDE and EBITDA Actually Measure

2.1 What is Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE)?

Seller’s Discretionary Earnings is a private-business transaction metric intended to estimate the economic benefit available to one full-time owner-operator before that owner’s discretionary compensation and certain owner-specific expenses. SDE is common in business brokerage and small-business sale discussions because many buyers of small companies are not passive investors. They are buying a livelihood, a management role, and an investment return in one package. Private-market education sources commonly describe SDE as earnings after adding back items such as one owner’s compensation, interest, depreciation, amortization, and supportable discretionary or nonrecurring expenses (MidStreet, n.d.; Wall Street Prep, n.d.).

SDE is not a GAAP line item. It is not an IRS valuation standard. It is not automatically accepted just because a seller labels an expense “personal” or “one-time.” It must be built from source documents and adjusted only when the adjustment is economically supportable. Professional valuation standards require analysts to consider the relevant facts, assumptions, financial information, and methods necessary for credible results (AICPA, n.d.; National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts [NACVA], n.d.; The Appraisal Foundation, n.d.).

A common SDE formula is:

Pretax business income
+ Interest expense
+ Depreciation and amortization
+ One full-time owner-operator's compensation and payroll taxes
+ Supportable owner-specific discretionary expenses paid by the business
+ Nonrecurring or non-operating expenses
- Nonrecurring or non-operating income
+/- Normalizing adjustments for rent, family payroll, accounting policies, inventory, and similar items
= Seller's Discretionary Earnings (SDE)

This formula is a starting framework, not a license to add back every inconvenient expense. The analyst must ask whether a market participant would avoid the expense, whether the cost is truly nonrecurring, whether it is necessary to maintain revenue, and whether it has already been captured elsewhere.

2.2 What is EBITDA?

EBITDA means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used because it removes the effects of capital structure, tax position, and certain noncash accounting charges. EBITDA can help compare companies with different debt levels or depreciation policies, and enterprise-value-to-EBITDA multiples are widely used in the market approach (CFA Institute, n.d.-b; Corporate Finance Institute, n.d.).

A basic EBITDA formula is:

Operating income (EBIT)
+ Depreciation
+ Amortization
= EBITDA

An alternative formula starts with net income:

Net income
+ Interest expense
+ Income taxes
+ Depreciation
+ Amortization
= EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA then adds or subtracts supportable normalization items:

EBITDA
+/- Nonrecurring expenses or income
+/- Non-operating expenses or income
+/- Market compensation adjustments for executives and related parties
+/- Related-party rent or service adjustments
= Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA is also not value. It excludes several real cash-flow items, including income taxes, capital expenditures, working-capital investment, and sometimes replacement management costs. For a company with heavy equipment, rapidly growing inventory, or significant maintenance capital expenditures, EBITDA may overstate distributable cash flow (CFA Institute, n.d.-a; Damodaran, n.d.).

2.3 Why both metrics are proxies, not valuation conclusions

A business valuation estimates value under a defined standard and premise. SDE and EBITDA are only measures of earnings. They do not automatically account for customer concentration, owner dependence, growth, cyclicality, required reinvestment, lease obligations, financing terms, minority or control attributes, marketability, asset quality, or legal rights attached to the subject interest. Standards from AICPA, USPAP, NACVA, ASA, and IVS emphasize scope, documentation, assumptions, approaches, and credible assignment results rather than mechanical reliance on a single metric (AICPA, n.d.; American Society of Appraisers [ASA], n.d.; IVSC, 2024; NACVA, n.d.; The Appraisal Foundation, n.d.).

That is why the best question is not “Which metric gives the highest number?” It is “Which metric matches the economics of the company and the evidence used in the valuation?”

3. SDE vs. EBITDA at a Glance

3.1 Comparison matrix

Feature	SDE	EBITDA	Why it matters in business valuation
Core purpose	Estimates economic benefit to one owner-operator	Estimates enterprise earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization	The metric must match the buyer’s role and the valuation method
Common company profile	Small, owner-operated, main-street business	Management-run or larger private company	Different businesses attract different buyers and comparable data
Owner compensation	Usually adds back one full-time owner’s compensation	Usually retains market management compensation	Replacement management cost is the central difference
Buyer assumption	Buyer may personally operate the business	Buyer expects transferable enterprise earnings	Passive and strategic buyers typically need EBITDA-like economics
Typical value basis	Often equity-like small-business transaction price, subject to deal terms	Often enterprise value before debt/cash adjustments	Numerator/denominator consistency is essential
Common add-backs	One owner salary, personal discretionary expenses, interest, D&A, nonrecurring items	D&A, nonrecurring items, non-operating items, market compensation adjustments	Not every SDE add-back belongs in adjusted EBITDA
Main limitation	Can overstate value if seller’s labor must be replaced	Can overstate cash flow if capex, taxes, and working capital are high	Both require reconciliation to cash flow and risk
Best supporting methods	Market approach using SDE data; capitalized owner benefit when appropriate	Market approach using EV/EBITDA; income approach; discounted cash flow	Comparable data must use the same metric definition
Diligence focus	Add-back support, owner role, transferability, working hours, personal expenses	Normalized margins, management depth, capex, working capital, debt/cash bridge	Each metric invites different buyer questions

3.2 The management-cost question

The most important distinction is management cost. In an owner-operated business, the owner’s salary may represent economic benefit to a buyer who will operate the company. In a management-run business, the buyer cannot remove that cost without damaging operations. If the seller works full time, sells the jobs, supervises employees, manages vendors, handles collections, and resolves emergencies, a passive buyer must replace that labor. Adding back the owner’s full salary without subtracting replacement management may overstate transferable earnings.

For example, assume a small service company reports $150,000 of pretax income after paying the owner $120,000. If an operator-buyer will replace the seller’s labor, SDE may start near $270,000 before other adjustments. If an absentee buyer must hire a general manager for $120,000 plus payroll taxes and benefits, EBITDA-like earnings may be much lower. The company did not become less profitable. The economic question changed.

3.3 The numerator/denominator consistency rule

A frequent valuation error is applying an EBITDA multiple to SDE or an SDE multiple to EBITDA. Market multiples require consistency between the value numerator and earnings denominator. Enterprise value multiples should be applied to enterprise-level metrics such as EBITDA, EBIT, revenue, or free cash flow depending on the dataset. Equity-like small-business prices should be compared to the exact earnings definition used in that market database or transaction record (CFA Institute, n.d.-b; Damodaran, n.d.).

If the comparable transaction database reports seller’s discretionary earnings, use SDE as defined by that database. If the database reports EBITDA and enterprise value, use EBITDA and then bridge from enterprise value to equity value. Mixing definitions can produce a value that looks precise but is not economically meaningful.

4. How to Calculate SDE

4.1 Start with reliable financial statements

A credible SDE calculation begins with reliable financial statements and records. Useful documents include tax returns, income statements, balance sheets, general ledgers, payroll reports, owner benefit schedules, credit card statements, bank statements, loan statements, leases, related-party contracts, and invoices supporting unusual items. IRS publications emphasize recordkeeping and business expense classification for tax purposes, and those records are often the starting point for valuation normalization (Internal Revenue Service [IRS], 2024a, 2024b, n.d.).

However, tax reporting and valuation economics are not identical. A cost can be deductible for tax purposes and still be discretionary from a buyer’s perspective. A cost can also be nondeductible and still represent a real economic burden. The valuation task is to normalize earnings to the expected economics of the business interest being valued.

4.2 Common SDE add-backs

Common SDE adjustments include:

• One full-time owner’s salary, payroll taxes, health insurance, retirement contributions, and other benefits, if the metric is intended to show owner-operator benefit.
• Personal auto, travel, phone, insurance, club dues, meals, or other owner-specific discretionary expenses paid through the company, if documented and not needed by the buyer.
• Compensation paid to family members who do not work in the business, or compensation above market for the work actually performed.
• Nonrecurring legal fees, casualty costs, relocation expenses, litigation settlements, startup costs, or unusual repairs.
• Related-party rent adjustments when the company pays above-market or below-market rent to an owner-controlled entity.
• Non-operating income or expense related to assets not included in the transaction.
• Accounting normalizations such as inventory reserves, revenue recognition changes, or one-time write-offs when supportable.

The key phrase is “when supportable.” Add-backs should tie to the general ledger, payroll records, invoices, tax returns, contracts, or other evidence. A buyer, lender, court, or appraiser should not have to accept a seller’s unsupported spreadsheet at face value.

4.3 Items that should not be casually added back

SDE is often abused. Some sellers attempt to add back normal payroll, ordinary advertising, routine repairs, required software subscriptions, recurring professional fees, recurring warranty expense, normal rent, employee training, insurance, or inventory shrinkage. If a buyer must incur the expense to generate the revenue, the expense generally should remain in earnings.

Another common mistake is adding back more than one owner’s compensation without analyzing the roles. SDE is often framed around one full-time owner-operator. If two owners work full time and one buyer can replace only one role, the second role may require a paid employee after closing. Similarly, if an owner’s spouse performs real bookkeeping, scheduling, or customer service work, the company may need to pay someone for that function even if the spouse will leave.

4.4 SDE calculation example

Assume an owner-operated HVAC contractor has the following normalized annual items:

Pretax income per tax return                                  $145,000
+ Interest expense                                             18,000
+ Depreciation and amortization                                42,000
+ Owner W-2 compensation and payroll taxes                     135,000
+ Documented personal vehicle and phone expense                 14,000
+ Nonrecurring legal settlement                                 22,000
+ Nonworking family payroll                                     18,000
- One-time insurance proceeds                                  (10,000)
+ Related-party rent adjustment to market                        8,000
= Indicated Seller's Discretionary Earnings (SDE)             $392,000

This calculation is not a value conclusion. It is a normalized earnings input. The business valuation still must consider the buyer universe, comparable transaction data, company risk, required working capital, equipment condition, customer concentration, and whether the owner’s technical or sales role is transferable.

5. How to Calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

5.1 EBITDA formula and discipline

EBITDA typically starts with net income or operating income and adds back interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The logic is that financing choices, tax profiles, and noncash D&A charges may differ across companies. Enterprise buyers often use EBITDA as a common starting point for comparing operating performance (CFA Institute, n.d.-b; Corporate Finance Institute, n.d.).

Net income                                                     $310,000
+ Interest expense                                              55,000
+ Income taxes                                                  70,000
+ Depreciation                                                  90,000
+ Amortization                                                  15,000
= EBITDA                                                       $540,000

The next step is adjusted EBITDA, but the word “adjusted” should not become a catch-all. A supportable adjustment usually reflects an item that is nonrecurring, non-operating, owner-specific, or not stated at market. Examples include a one-time litigation expense, discontinued product-line costs, above-market related-party rent, or excess owner compensation above a market salary for the role performed.

5.2 Adjusted EBITDA example

EBITDA                                                        $540,000
+ One-time litigation expense                                   45,000
- Nonrecurring gain on sale of equipment                       (20,000)
+ Excess owner compensation over market                         35,000
+ Related-party rent above market                               25,000
= Adjusted EBITDA                                              $625,000

Notice that this calculation does not add back all owner compensation. If the owner is the chief executive and the business needs a chief executive after closing, the market cost of that role remains. Only compensation above or below market is normalized.

5.3 Why EBITDA is not cash flow

EBITDA is useful, but it can be dangerous when treated as cash flow. A manufacturing business may report strong EBITDA while requiring constant equipment replacement. An e-commerce business may report positive EBITDA while consuming cash through inventory growth. A construction company may show EBITDA that ignores bonding needs, retainage, and working-capital swings. A restaurant may have EBITDA before major leasehold improvements or equipment replacements.

Discounted cash flow analysis generally requires projected revenue, margins, taxes, working capital, capital expenditures, and terminal value, discounted at a rate consistent with the risk of the cash flows (CFA Institute, n.d.-a; Damodaran, n.d.). EBITDA can help begin that analysis, but it does not finish it.

6. The SDE-to-EBITDA Bridge: The Most Useful Tool for Many Private Companies

6.1 When to bridge

The SDE-to-EBITDA bridge is one of the most practical tools in private-company valuation. It is especially useful when a company has historically been owner-operated but may attract a passive buyer, strategic acquirer, private equity group, lender-financed buyer, or investor who cannot personally perform the seller’s role. It is also useful when a company has multiple owners, family employees, or inconsistent officer compensation.

The bridge helps prevent two errors: overstating earnings by ignoring replacement management, and understating owner benefit by treating a true owner-operated business as if it had institutional management needs.

6.2 Bridge formula

Seller's Discretionary Earnings (SDE)
- Market salary for replacement general manager / owner-operator role
- Payroll taxes and benefits on replacement compensation
+/- Adjustments for owners who remain, depart, are underpaid, or are overpaid
= EBITDA-like earnings after management replacement

6.3 Bridge example: owner-operated HVAC contractor

Using the earlier HVAC example, SDE was $392,000. Assume a market replacement general manager would cost $115,000 in salary plus $18,000 in payroll taxes and benefits. Assume the buyer also needs part-time estimating support because the seller generated many proposals personally.

Seller's Discretionary Earnings (SDE)                         $392,000
- Replacement general manager salary                           (115,000)
- Payroll taxes and benefits                                    (18,000)
- Part-time estimating support                                  (24,000)
= EBITDA-like transferable earnings                            $235,000

For an owner-operator buyer, the $392,000 SDE may be relevant because the buyer expects to work in the business. For an absentee buyer, lender, or strategic acquirer, the $235,000 EBITDA-like figure may be more relevant. A professional business appraisal might present both indications and reconcile them based on the likely market participant and valuation purpose.

7. Which Metric Fits Which Business?

7.1 Owner-operated local service businesses

SDE is often useful for local service businesses such as HVAC, plumbing, landscaping, cleaning, small repair, small retail, single-location restaurants, and owner-operated franchise units. These businesses may depend heavily on the owner’s labor, relationships, reputation, and daily supervision. A buyer may be purchasing both an income stream and a job.

That said, SDE is not automatically correct for every small business. If the owner is irreplaceable, holds a required license, generates most sales personally, or maintains customer relationships that may not transfer, the appraiser must consider risk and transferability. A high SDE with weak transferability may not support a high value.

7.2 Management-run and lower-middle-market companies

EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA is usually more appropriate when a company has managers, supervisors, sales leadership, financial systems, and processes that can continue after the seller exits. Strategic buyers and financial sponsors often evaluate enterprise earnings, synergies, working capital, growth, and capital expenditures. Market evidence in this segment is commonly framed around enterprise value and EBITDA, although the exact convention depends on the data source (CFA Institute, n.d.-b; International Business Brokers Association [IBBA] & M&A Source, 2024; Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, n.d.).

7.3 Asset-heavy businesses

Asset-heavy businesses require extra caution. Equipment rental, manufacturing, trucking, construction, restaurants, and medical practices may report meaningful EBITDA while requiring substantial replacement capital expenditures. In those cases, EBITDA can overstate the economic cash flow available to owners. The asset approach may also become important, particularly when tangible assets are material or earnings are weak relative to asset value (AICPA, n.d.; IVSC, 2024).

7.4 Professional practices and personal goodwill businesses

Professional practices such as dental, medical, legal, accounting, consulting, and advisory firms often require deeper analysis of personal goodwill and transferability. SDE may show the seller’s historical benefit, but value may depend on patient/client retention, credentialing, noncompetition agreements, referral sources, provider replacement costs, and the extent to which goodwill attaches to the enterprise rather than the individual professional. A business valuation in this setting should not rely solely on a simple SDE multiple.

8. Metric Selection Decision Tree

This decision tree is not a substitute for professional judgment. It is a practical way to keep the analysis focused on economics: who will run the business, what earnings are transferable, and which valuation methods are supported by the available evidence.

9. How SDE and EBITDA Fit the Main Valuation Methods

9.1 Market approach

The market approach uses prices or multiples from comparable transactions or companies. It can be persuasive when the data are relevant, recent, comparable, and properly normalized. But the market approach is also where metric confusion causes many errors.

If the comparable data are based on seller’s discretionary earnings, the subject company’s SDE should be calculated in a similar manner. If the data are enterprise-value-to-EBITDA multiples, the subject company’s EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA should be calculated consistently, and the resulting enterprise value should be bridged to equity value. Industry classification, size, growth, margins, customer concentration, geography, and deal structure all affect comparability. NAICS codes can help organize industry comparisons, but classification alone does not prove economic comparability (U.S. Census Bureau, n.d.).

9.2 Income approach: capitalization of earnings

A capitalization of earnings method may be appropriate when normalized earnings are stable and expected growth and risk can be reasonably represented in a capitalization rate. SDE can sometimes support an owner-benefit capitalization analysis for a small owner-operated company. EBITDA can support an enterprise earnings analysis when converted to a cash-flow base. In both cases, the appraiser must ensure that the selected earnings stream, capitalization rate, and value basis are consistent.

9.3 Discounted cash flow

Discounted cash flow (DCF) projects expected future cash flows and discounts them to present value. DCF is particularly useful when revenue, margins, working capital, capital expenditures, or growth are expected to change materially. EBITDA and SDE may help establish the starting point, but a DCF should generally convert earnings to cash flow by considering taxes, reinvestment, working capital, and terminal assumptions (CFA Institute, n.d.-a; Damodaran, n.d.).

9.4 Asset approach

The asset approach estimates value by adjusting assets and liabilities to appropriate values. It may be important for holding companies, asset-heavy companies, distressed companies, or businesses with weak earnings. It may also be used as a reasonableness check when tangible assets are significant. EBITDA and SDE focus on earnings, but asset value can set a floor, identify non-operating assets, or reveal that earnings do not justify the capital invested.

9.5 Method alignment table

Valuation method	Best metric starting point	Key adjustments	When it works	Cautions
Market approach using small-business transactions	SDE if comparable data use SDE	Owner compensation, personal expenses, interest, D&A, nonrecurring items	Owner-operated companies with relevant transaction data	Confirm included assets, inventory, debt, seller financing, and SDE definition
Market approach using enterprise transactions	EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA	Market management cost, nonrecurring items, related-party rent, non-operating items	Management-run or lower-middle-market companies	Use enterprise value consistency and bridge to equity value
Capitalization of earnings	Normalized cash flow derived from SDE or EBITDA	Taxes, capex, working capital, replacement management, growth	Stable businesses with predictable earnings	Capitalization rate must match the cash-flow stream
Discounted cash flow	Projected free cash flow	Revenue growth, margins, taxes, capex, working capital, terminal value	Growth, cyclicality, changing margins, significant reinvestment	Forecast assumptions must be supportable
Asset approach	Adjusted net assets	Fair value of assets/liabilities, non-operating assets, contingent liabilities	Asset-heavy, distressed, holding-company, weak-earnings cases	May understate goodwill in profitable operating businesses

10. Add-Back Treatment: What Belongs in SDE, EBITDA, Both, or Neither

10.1 Add-back classification table

Item	Usually in SDE?	Usually in adjusted EBITDA?	Documentation needed	Common mistake
One full-time owner salary	Yes	Only excess over market replacement cost	Payroll records, role description, market comp support	Adding back all owner pay when a manager is required
Second owner salary	Sometimes	Only excess/shortfall versus market role	Payroll, duties, hours, replacement plan	Assuming one buyer can replace two full-time roles
Personal auto expense	Sometimes	Sometimes, if not business-required	General ledger, mileage, title/use evidence	Adding back vehicles needed for operations
Family payroll	Sometimes	Sometimes	Payroll records, job duties, market wage	Adding back real work performed by family
Interest expense	Yes	Already added back in EBITDA	Loan statements, P&L detail	Double-counting interest adjustments
Income taxes	Usually pretax metric	Already added back in EBITDA	Tax returns, P&L	Treating pretax earnings as after-tax cash flow
Depreciation/amortization	Yes	Yes	Fixed asset detail	Ignoring replacement capital expenditures
Nonrecurring legal expense	Often	Often	Invoices, settlement documents	Calling recurring legal fees nonrecurring
Related-party rent	Normalize to market	Normalize to market	Lease, market rent support	Removing rent entirely when buyer needs premises
Normal payroll	No	No	Payroll reports	Adding back necessary employee labor
Inventory write-down	Depends	Depends	Inventory records, cause, recurrence	Ignoring recurring shrinkage or obsolescence
Working capital build	Not an add-back	Not an EBITDA add-back	Balance sheets, cash conversion cycle	Treating EBITDA as cash without working capital needs
Capital expenditures	Not an add-back to EBITDA; cash-flow adjustment	Not an EBITDA add-back; cash-flow adjustment	Fixed asset history, maintenance plans	Ignoring required reinvestment
Non-operating asset income	Remove if asset excluded	Remove if asset excluded	Asset ownership records, income detail	Mixing operating business value with excluded assets

10.2 Documentation standard for add-backs

A reliable add-back schedule should be boring in the best possible way. Every adjustment should have a description, amount, period, source document, rationale, recurrence conclusion, and expected buyer treatment. The schedule should state whether the adjustment affects SDE, adjusted EBITDA, both, or neither. Valuation standards support this discipline because assumptions and methods must be sufficient for credible results and appropriate reporting (AICPA, n.d.; NACVA, n.d.; The Appraisal Foundation, n.d.).

10.3 Tax deductibility is not the same as valuation treatment

IRS guidance distinguishes business expenses from personal expenses and discusses ordinary and necessary expenses for tax purposes (IRS, 2024a, n.d.). That is helpful, but valuation treatment is a separate question. A deductible expense may still be discretionary from a buyer’s perspective. A nondeductible expense may still be an economic cost. A valuation analyst must focus on expected market-participant economics, not merely tax labels.

11. Enterprise Value, Equity Value, Debt, Cash, Working Capital, and Included Assets

11.1 Why EBITDA normally links to enterprise value

EBITDA multiples are commonly associated with enterprise value, meaning the value of the operating business before considering how it is financed. Enterprise value is generally reconciled to equity value by considering interest-bearing debt, cash, working capital, non-operating assets, and non-operating liabilities. The exact bridge depends on the transaction structure and valuation premise.

11.2 Why SDE transaction prices must be read carefully

Small-business transactions can vary widely. Some include inventory; others price inventory separately. Some include furniture, fixtures, and equipment; others exclude real estate or require a lease. Some involve seller financing, earnouts, assumed liabilities, retained cash, or working-capital targets. A price-to-SDE indication is meaningful only when the analyst understands what the transaction price includes.

11.3 Enterprise-value-to-equity-value bridge

Enterprise value from EBITDA indication
- Interest-bearing debt assumed or paid off
+ Cash and cash equivalents transferred to buyer, if any
+/- Working capital surplus or deficit relative to target
+ Non-operating assets transferred
- Non-operating liabilities transferred
= Equity value / transaction value to seller before deal-specific terms

For example, assume an EBITDA-based market approach indicates enterprise value of $4,000,000. If the company has $600,000 of debt to be paid off, $150,000 of cash retained by the seller, a $100,000 working-capital deficit, and $80,000 of non-operating equipment excluded from the sale, the value to equity or transaction proceeds may differ significantly from the enterprise value. A business valuation should not stop at the multiple.

12. Practical Case Studies

12.1 Case Study A: Owner-operated HVAC contractor

An HVAC contractor has one owner who handles estimating, customer relationships, supplier negotiations, and field supervision. The company reports $145,000 in pretax income after owner compensation. Add-backs for interest, depreciation, one owner’s compensation, documented personal expenses, and nonrecurring legal costs produce SDE of $392,000. If the buyer is another licensed operator who will perform the seller’s role, SDE is highly relevant.

However, an absentee buyer would need a general manager and part-time estimating support. The SDE-to-EBITDA bridge reduces transferable earnings to $235,000. A market approach using SDE may be appropriate for an operator-buyer scenario, while an EBITDA-like or cash-flow analysis may be better for a passive buyer. The final business appraisal should define the likely market participant, not simply choose the larger number.

12.2 Case Study B: Multi-location dental support/admin company

A dental support/admin company operates multiple locations with office managers, billing staff, and regional oversight. The owner is strategic but not the only producer. The company already pays professional managers, but the owner’s salary is above market for the role performed. In this case, adjusted EBITDA is likely more useful than SDE. The analyst may normalize officer compensation to market, adjust related-party rent, remove nonrecurring consulting fees, and evaluate working capital.

The company may still require a DCF if growth plans involve new locations, equipment purchases, or margin changes. SDE would be less useful because a buyer is not simply purchasing a single owner-operator job. The value is in the transferable enterprise.

12.3 Case Study C: E-commerce company with inventory growth

An e-commerce company reports positive EBITDA, but inventory has doubled as the company expanded product lines. Advertising costs are rising, and the owner personally manages supplier relationships. EBITDA may make the company look profitable, while cash flow is strained by inventory investment. SDE may add back some owner benefits, but the owner’s vendor role may require replacement.

This case calls for both a management-cost analysis and a discounted cash flow model. The DCF should consider revenue growth, gross margin, advertising efficiency, inventory turns, taxes, working capital, and fulfillment costs. EBITDA is a starting point. It is not the cash available to the buyer.

12.4 Case Study D: Restaurant with owner-owned real estate

A restaurant operates in a building owned by the seller. The restaurant pays below-market rent to a related real estate entity. The seller intends to sell the operating business but retain the building and sign a new lease. Historical SDE may overstate buyer benefit because occupancy cost will increase. EBITDA must also be normalized to market rent.

The valuation should separate the operating company from the real estate. The asset approach may be relevant for furniture, fixtures, equipment, and leasehold improvements, while the income and market approaches may be applied to the operating business after market rent is included.

12.5 Case-study comparison table

Case	Likely primary metric	Key add-backs or adjustments	Valuation-method check	Main risk
Owner-operated HVAC	SDE for operator buyer; bridge to EBITDA for passive buyer	Owner compensation, vehicle, legal, family payroll, replacement manager	Market approach using matching SDE data; cash-flow check	Owner dependence and replacement labor
Dental support/admin	Adjusted EBITDA	Market officer compensation, related-party rent, nonrecurring consulting	EBITDA market approach; DCF for growth	Confusing owner salary add-back with required management
E-commerce inventory business	EBITDA plus DCF; SDE bridge if owner-managed	Owner role, working capital, advertising, inventory	Discounted cash flow and working-capital analysis	EBITDA not converting to cash
Restaurant/real estate	Adjusted EBITDA and asset checks	Market rent, FF&E, lease terms, excluded real estate	Market/income approach for operations; asset approach for FF&E	Below-market rent overstating earnings

13. Common Mistakes That Distort Business Valuation Results

13.1 Applying an EBITDA multiple to SDE

This is one of the most damaging mistakes. If SDE includes owner compensation and EBITDA retains management cost, the two denominators are different. Applying the wrong multiple can materially misstate value. Market multiples must match the earnings metric and value basis (CFA Institute, n.d.-b; Damodaran, n.d.).

13.2 Adding back normal operating costs

If the expense is necessary to generate revenue, it usually belongs in earnings. Sellers may want to add back marketing, repairs, software, insurance, or professional fees, but recurring expenses should remain unless the buyer can truly avoid them.

13.3 Ignoring replacement management

An owner salary add-back is not free money for a passive buyer. If the seller leaves, someone must perform the seller’s role. The SDE-to-EBITDA bridge prevents overstating transferable earnings.

13.4 Using EBITDA when capex and working capital dominate cash flow

EBITDA excludes capital expenditures and working-capital investment. It can be especially misleading in inventory-heavy, equipment-heavy, or fast-growing businesses. Discounted cash flow or adjusted cash-flow analysis may be necessary.

13.5 Treating tax returns as normalized statements without analysis

Tax returns are valuable records, but they are often prepared for tax compliance rather than valuation. Depreciation methods, owner compensation, related-party expenses, tax credits, and discretionary expenses may require normalization. IRS publications help classify tax items, but valuation adjustments require broader economic analysis (IRS, 2024a, 2024b, n.d.).

13.6 Risk matrix

Error	Likely direction of value distortion	Who is affected	How to prevent it	Source support
Applying EBITDA multiple to SDE	Often overstates value	Buyer, lender, appraiser, seller in failed deal	Match numerator and denominator	CFA market multiples; Damodaran
Adding back required payroll	Overstates earnings	Buyer and lender	Verify job duties and replacement needs	AICPA; USPAP; IRS records
Ignoring replacement manager	Overstates passive-buyer value	Passive buyer, lender	Build SDE-to-EBITDA bridge	SDE practice sources; valuation standards
Removing market rent	Overstates operating earnings	Buyer, seller, landlord	Normalize to market lease terms	AICPA; IVS
Ignoring capex	Overstates cash flow	Buyer, lender	Analyze maintenance and growth capex	CFA free cash flow; CFI EBITDA limitations
Ignoring working capital	Overstates cash available	Buyer, lender	Analyze AR, inventory, AP, seasonality	CFA free cash flow
Unsupported nonrecurring add-backs	Overstates earnings	Buyer, appraiser, court	Tie to invoices/contracts and recurrence analysis	USPAP; NACVA
Stale or mismatched comparables	Unreliable value indication	All parties	Use relevant industry, size, date, metric, and deal terms	CFA; Census NAICS

14. Documentation Checklist Before Ordering or Reviewing a Business Appraisal

A clean valuation process saves time and reduces disputes. Before requesting or reviewing a business valuation, assemble the following:

• Three to five years of business tax returns.
• Year-end and interim income statements and balance sheets.
• General ledger or trial balance detail for add-back accounts.
• Payroll reports, W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, and owner benefit detail.
• Schedule of owner compensation, family payroll, and job duties.
• Credit card statements and invoices for claimed personal or discretionary expenses.
• Loan statements, interest schedules, and debt terms.
• Fixed asset list, depreciation schedule, and recent capital expenditure history.
• Lease agreements and related-party rent support.
• Inventory reports, accounts receivable aging, accounts payable aging, and working-capital data.
• Customer concentration, revenue by product/service, and gross margin detail.
• Employee roster, management organization chart, and owner role description.
• Legal bills, settlement documents, insurance claims, casualty records, or other nonrecurring item support.
• List of non-operating assets and liabilities.
• Letter of intent, term sheet, SBA/lender requirements, buy-sell agreement, divorce order, shareholder agreement, or tax/litigation documents if applicable.
• Clear statement of valuation purpose, valuation date, standard of value, premise of value, and subject interest.

The more complete the support, the less likely the valuation will rely on unsupported add-backs or generic assumptions.

15. A Practical Add-Back Workflow

This workflow helps sellers, buyers, CPAs, and attorneys evaluate the quality of an add-back schedule before it becomes a negotiation problem. It also aligns with the professional expectation that valuation work be supported, documented, and appropriate for the assignment scope (AICPA, n.d.; The Appraisal Foundation, n.d.).

16. When a Professional Valuation Should Use Both SDE and EBITDA

16.1 Transitional companies

Many private companies do not fit neatly into “small owner-operated” or “fully institutional.” A company may have $2 million to $10 million of revenue, a partial management team, a seller who still controls sales, and a buyer universe that includes both owner-operators and strategic acquirers. In these cases, both SDE and EBITDA can be informative. The appraiser may calculate SDE, adjusted EBITDA, and free cash flow, then reconcile the indications based on market participant assumptions.

16.2 Multiple buyer universes

Metric selection also depends on who is expected to buy or use the valuation. An owner-operator buyer may focus on SDE. A strategic acquirer may focus on EBITDA and synergies. A lender may focus on repayment capacity. A divorce court, estate planner, shareholder dispute, or buy-sell agreement may require a defined standard of value and a broader business appraisal. SBA acquisition financing can introduce specific lender and valuation requirements, making documentation and independence important (U.S. Small Business Administration [SBA], n.d.).

16.3 Reconciliation and weighting

Professional valuation is not simply picking the highest metric or averaging random outputs. Reconciliation should explain which methods were used, which were rejected, why the selected metrics match the company’s economics, and how the final conclusion reflects risk, growth, transferability, assets, liabilities, and market evidence. That is the discipline that separates a defensible business valuation from a pricing shortcut.

17. How Buyers, Sellers, CPAs, Attorneys, and Lenders Should Use This Guidance

17.1 Sellers

Sellers should prepare add-back support before going to market. A clean SDE or adjusted EBITDA schedule can improve credibility, but aggressive adjustments can damage trust. Sellers should document each add-back, understand whether the buyer is operator or passive, and be ready to explain the owner’s role. If a professional business appraisal is needed for sale planning, buy-sell planning, divorce, litigation, tax, or financing, waiting until a dispute arises can be costly.

17.2 Buyers

Buyers should rebuild earnings from source documents. Do not rely only on a broker’s summary. Ask which owner expenses are truly avoidable, which employees perform essential roles, whether the seller’s relationships will transfer, and what capital the business requires after closing. If using an SDE multiple, verify that comparable data are actually based on SDE. If using EBITDA, bridge from enterprise value to equity value and consider working capital and debt.

17.3 CPAs

CPAs can help by preparing clean financial statements, reconciling tax returns to books, identifying owner benefits, and distinguishing tax treatment from valuation economics. CPAs should avoid assuming that every deductible item is a normal business expense for valuation or that every personal-looking expense is automatically an add-back.

17.4 Attorneys

Attorneys should define the transaction assets, excluded assets, working-capital target, debt/cash treatment, seller financing, indemnities, and dispute mechanisms. In buy-sell agreements, divorce settlements, shareholder disputes, and estate planning, attorneys should ensure that the valuation standard, level of value, valuation date, appraiser qualifications, and methodology provisions are clear.

17.5 Lenders and SBA context

Lenders care about cash flow, collateral, repayment capacity, leverage, and buyer experience. In SBA-financed acquisitions, lender procedures and valuation requirements may apply depending on the transaction. A valuation report that clearly explains SDE, EBITDA, add-backs, replacement management, and cash-flow conversion can help reduce underwriting confusion (SBA, n.d.).

18. Frequently Asked Questions

18.1 Is SDE the same as EBITDA?

No. SDE usually adds back one owner-operator’s compensation and certain discretionary owner benefits. EBITDA adds back interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization but generally retains the cost of management needed to operate the business. The two metrics can differ significantly.

18.2 Which is better for valuing a small business: SDE or EBITDA?

SDE is often more useful for a small owner-operated business where the buyer will work in the business. EBITDA is often more useful when the company needs paid management after closing or when enterprise-value market data are used. The better metric is the one that matches the company’s economics and the valuation purpose.

18.3 When should an owner’s salary be added back?

An owner’s salary is commonly added back in SDE when the metric is intended to show one owner-operator’s total economic benefit. In adjusted EBITDA, only the excess or shortfall compared with market compensation is typically normalized, because the business still needs management.

18.4 Should a buyer subtract a replacement manager salary from SDE?

Yes, if the buyer will not personally perform the seller’s role. Subtracting market replacement compensation converts SDE into an EBITDA-like measure of transferable enterprise earnings.

18.5 Is EBITDA a cash-flow measure?

EBITDA is a proxy, not true cash flow. It excludes taxes, capital expenditures, working-capital investment, and debt service. Discounted cash flow analysis should convert earnings into expected cash flows before discounting them.

18.6 Can I use the same multiple for SDE and EBITDA?

No. SDE and EBITDA are different denominators and often relate to different value bases. Applying the same multiple to both can produce a misleading value conclusion.

18.7 How do personal expenses affect SDE?

Personal expenses paid by the business may be added back to SDE if they are documented, owner-specific, and not required by the buyer. Unsupported or recurring operating expenses should not be added back casually.

18.8 What documents prove an add-back?

Useful support includes general ledger detail, invoices, payroll records, tax returns, credit card statements, contracts, lease agreements, legal bills, insurance records, and management explanations tied to specific amounts and periods.

18.9 How does debt affect EBITDA-based value?

EBITDA multiples often produce enterprise value. To estimate equity value or seller proceeds, the analyst must adjust for debt, cash, working capital, and non-operating assets or liabilities.

18.10 How do working capital and inventory affect value?

Working capital and inventory can consume cash even when EBITDA is positive. A growing business may need additional inventory, receivables, or deposits. A valuation should analyze normal working capital and whether a surplus or deficit exists at closing.

18.11 When does the asset approach matter more than SDE or EBITDA?

The asset approach may be especially important for asset-heavy, distressed, holding-company, or weak-earnings businesses. It can also help identify non-operating assets or test whether earnings support the tangible asset base.

18.12 How does discounted cash flow relate to EBITDA and SDE?

DCF may start with EBITDA, SDE, or normalized earnings, but it should project cash flows after considering taxes, working capital, capital expenditures, growth, and risk. DCF is often useful when historical earnings do not represent expected future cash flow.

18.13 Do SBA lenders prefer SDE or EBITDA?

It depends on the transaction, borrower, lender, and SBA requirements. Lenders focus on repayment capacity and may review cash flow, add-backs, owner compensation, debt service, and independent valuation support. SBA procedures may require specific valuation steps in certain acquisitions (SBA, n.d.).

18.14 Should I get a professional business appraisal before selling?

If the metric choice affects price, financing, taxes, litigation, buy-sell terms, divorce settlement, shareholder rights, or estate planning, a professional business appraisal can be valuable. It can also help sellers understand which add-backs are supportable before buyers challenge them.

19. Conclusion: Choose the Metric That Matches the Economics

SDE and EBITDA are both useful, but neither is universally superior. SDE answers: “What economic benefit may one owner-operator receive from this business?” EBITDA answers: “What enterprise earnings remain before financing, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, assuming necessary management costs are reflected?” A complete business valuation answers a broader question: what is the business worth under a defined standard and premise, using appropriate valuation methods, normalized earnings, risk analysis, market evidence, and asset/liability adjustments.

For owner-operated companies, SDE can be a practical way to understand buyer benefit. For management-run companies, EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA may better reflect transferable earnings. For many private businesses, the best answer is to calculate both, bridge from SDE to EBITDA, convert earnings to cash flow where needed, and reconcile the market approach, income approach, discounted cash flow, and asset approach based on the facts.

If you are preparing to buy, sell, finance, litigate, or plan around a private company, do not let the metric choose the valuation for you. Choose the metric because it matches the business. A defensible business appraisal from SimplyBusinessValuation.com can help identify the right earnings base, document add-backs, and present a valuation conclusion that buyers, sellers, lenders, and advisors can understand.

20. Practical Next Steps Before You Rely on SDE or EBITDA

The final step is to convert the concepts above into a clean process. Owners and advisors can use the following practical sequence before presenting a business to buyers, lenders, partners, or an appraiser.

First, prepare a normalized trailing twelve-month income statement and at least three historical years of annual statements. The trailing period helps show current performance, while the annual history helps distinguish one-time events from recurring economics. If revenue or margins changed materially, explain why. A valuation analyst should not have to guess whether growth reflects a new contract, price increases, acquisitions, inflation, one-time demand, or accounting changes.

Second, create two separate schedules: an SDE schedule and an adjusted EBITDA schedule. Keeping them separate prevents double counting. In the SDE schedule, show one owner-operator’s compensation and discretionary benefits. In the adjusted EBITDA schedule, show market compensation for management and only normalize compensation above or below market. If a seller believes both metrics are relevant, add a bridge that reconciles SDE to EBITDA-like earnings.

Third, classify every adjustment. Use categories such as owner compensation, personal/discretionary expense, nonrecurring expense, non-operating item, related-party transaction, accounting normalization, working-capital issue, or capital-expenditure issue. This classification matters because some items affect earnings, while others affect cash flow, enterprise value, equity value, or transaction terms. For example, a one-time legal settlement may affect adjusted EBITDA, but an inventory build may not be an EBITDA add-back; instead, it affects cash flow and working capital.

Fourth, identify what is included in the transaction or valuation subject. Are cash, accounts receivable, inventory, vehicles, equipment, debt, real estate, intellectual property, and working capital included or excluded? Two businesses with the same EBITDA can have different values if one requires substantial working capital or excludes critical operating assets. Likewise, two SDE-based transactions can differ if one includes inventory and seller financing while the other does not.

Fifth, match the method to the evidence. If reliable comparable transactions use SDE, the market approach should use a consistent SDE definition. If reliable data use enterprise value to EBITDA, the analysis should calculate EBITDA consistently and bridge to equity value. If future performance is expected to differ from history, discounted cash flow may deserve more weight. If assets dominate earnings, the asset approach may be necessary. This method discipline is central to credible valuation work (AICPA, n.d.; CFA Institute, n.d.-a; IVSC, 2024).

Finally, decide whether the stakes justify a professional business appraisal. A casual estimate may be enough for early planning, but a formal business valuation is usually more appropriate when the conclusion will influence a sale price, loan, shareholder dispute, divorce settlement, estate or gift plan, buy-sell agreement, tax filing, or litigation matter. The cost of using the wrong metric can be far greater than the cost of documenting the right one.

21. Frequently Asked Questions About EBITDA vs. SDE

FAQ 1. Is SDE better than EBITDA for small business valuation?

SDE is often more useful for a small, owner-operated business because it shows the economic benefit potentially available to one full-time owner-operator. EBITDA is often more useful when a company has transferable management and the buyer will not personally replace the seller’s day-to-day labor. Neither metric is automatically better. The correct metric depends on the buyer universe, the valuation purpose, and the evidence used in the business valuation.

FAQ 2. Can I use an EBITDA multiple on SDE?

Usually no. An EBITDA multiple should be applied to EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA, not to SDE, unless the underlying market evidence clearly defines the denominator as SDE. Applying an enterprise-value-to-EBITDA multiple to SDE mixes the numerator and denominator and can materially overstate value. The market approach requires consistency between the comparable transaction metric and the subject company metric (CFA Institute, n.d.-b; Damodaran, n.d.).

FAQ 3. Why does SDE add back owner salary but EBITDA usually does not?

SDE is designed around one owner-operator. If a buyer will personally perform the seller’s role, the seller’s compensation may represent part of the buyer’s economic benefit. EBITDA is designed around enterprise earnings, so the company usually must include the cost of necessary management. If the seller is essential to operations, a valuation should consider replacement compensation rather than simply adding back the owner’s full pay.

FAQ 4. Should adjusted EBITDA include personal expenses?

Only if the expenses are truly non-operating, owner-specific, documented, and not needed by a market participant to maintain revenue. Personal expenses may be valid add-backs in an SDE schedule, but adjusted EBITDA should be more disciplined because it is meant to represent transferable enterprise earnings. Unsupported “personal expense” labels are not enough; invoices, general ledger detail, tax treatment, and business purpose should be reviewed.

FAQ 5. How does discounted cash flow relate to EBITDA and SDE?

Discounted cash flow does not value EBITDA or SDE directly. It values expected future cash flows after considering revenue growth, margins, taxes, working capital, capital expenditures, and risk. EBITDA and SDE may help normalize historical earnings, but a DCF model must convert those earnings into cash flow. That is why a capital-intensive business may have strong EBITDA but weaker free cash flow (CFA Institute, n.d.-a; Damodaran, n.d.).

FAQ 6. What is the biggest mistake sellers make with add-backs?

The biggest mistake is treating every unusual, discretionary, or inconvenient expense as an add-back without evidence. Buyers, lenders, and valuation analysts will ask whether the expense is truly nonrecurring, whether it is needed to run the business, whether it has already been normalized somewhere else, and whether a replacement cost must be subtracted. A clean add-back schedule is more persuasive than a long unsupported list.

FAQ 7. When should a business show both SDE and EBITDA?

A company should show both when buyer type is uncertain, when the business is transitioning from owner-operated to management-run, when a seller wants to speak to both individual buyers and financial/strategic buyers, or when financing sources request EBITDA-style analysis. A bridge from SDE to EBITDA helps explain the difference and reduces confusion during diligence.

FAQ 8. Does the asset approach use SDE or EBITDA?

The asset approach generally focuses on the fair value of assets and liabilities rather than a direct multiple of SDE or EBITDA. However, earnings still matter because they can indicate whether assets are productive, impaired, or supported by expected returns. Asset-heavy, distressed, holding-company, or low-earnings businesses may require an asset approach even when SDE or EBITDA calculations are available (AICPA, n.d.; IVSC, 2024).

FAQ 9. Are SDE and EBITDA accepted in SBA lending?

SBA acquisition lending often involves cash-flow analysis and may require an independent business valuation depending on the loan structure, buyer-seller relationship, and other facts under SBA procedures. Lenders may review seller compensation, add-backs, debt service, and management continuity. SDE can be relevant for owner-operator repayment capacity, while EBITDA-style analysis may be useful for enterprise cash flow and comparability (U.S. Small Business Administration, n.d.).

FAQ 10. How many years of SDE or EBITDA should be analyzed?

A valuation commonly reviews multiple historical years plus trailing twelve months when available. The exact period depends on the industry, growth stage, cyclicality, accounting quality, and valuation date. One year may be misleading if the company had a temporary spike, customer loss, owner transition, pandemic-related disruption, or major accounting change. The analyst should explain why the selected earnings base is representative.

FAQ 11. Can a business have positive EBITDA but negative value?

A business with positive EBITDA can still have limited or even negative equity value if debt, required working capital, capital expenditures, lease obligations, litigation, customer concentration, declining demand, or asset impairment consume the apparent earnings. EBITDA is before several real claims on cash flow. Enterprise value and equity value must be bridged carefully, and a professional business appraisal should consider the whole balance sheet and risk profile.

FAQ 12. What should I send to a valuation analyst before discussing SDE or EBITDA?

Send tax returns, financial statements, trailing twelve-month financials, general ledger detail, payroll records, owner compensation detail, related-party transactions, rent agreements, debt schedules, equipment lists, customer concentration reports, nonrecurring-expense support, and notes explaining the owner’s actual duties. Better source documents allow the analyst to separate SDE, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, and free cash flow more reliably.

References

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (n.d.). Statement on Standards for Valuation Services No. 1: Valuation of a business, business ownership interest, security, or intangible asset. https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/download/statement-on-standards-for-valuation-services-vs-section-100

American Society of Appraisers. (n.d.). Business valuation. https://www.appraisers.org/disciplines/business-valuation-BV

Bureau of Economic Analysis. (n.d.). Gross domestic product. https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

Business Valuation Resources. (n.d.). DealStats. https://www.bvresources.com/products/dealstats

CFA Institute. (n.d.-a). Free cash flow valuation. https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/membership/professional-development/refresher-readings/free-cash-flow-valuation

CFA Institute. (n.d.-b). Market-based valuation: Price and enterprise value multiples. https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/membership/professional-development/refresher-readings/market-based-valuation-price-enterprise-value-multiples

Corporate Finance Institute. (n.d.). What is EBITDA? https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/valuation/what-is-ebitda/

Damodaran, A. (n.d.). Damodaran online. New York University Stern School of Business. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/

Financial Accounting Standards Board. (n.d.). Accounting Standards Codification. https://asc.fasb.org/

International Business Brokers Association. (n.d.). Industry research. https://www.ibba.org/resource-center/industry-research/

International Business Brokers Association & M&A Source. (2024). Market Pulse Q1 2024 survey results. https://www.ibba.org/market-pulse-q1-2024-survey-results/

International Valuation Standards Council. (2024). International Valuation Standards. https://ivsc.org/standards/

Internal Revenue Service. (2024a). Publication 535: Business expenses. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p535.pdf

Internal Revenue Service. (2024b). Publication 334: Tax guide for small business. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p334

Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.). Deducting business expenses. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/deducting-business-expenses

Mercer Capital. (n.d.). Insights. https://mercercapital.com/insights/

MidStreet. (n.d.). Seller’s discretionary earnings explained with examples. https://www.midstreet.com/blog/sellers-discretionary-earnings-explained-with-examples

National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts. (n.d.). Professional standards. https://www.nacva.com/bvstandards

Pepperdine Graziadio Business School. (n.d.). Private Capital Markets Report. Pepperdine Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/gsbm_pcm_pcmr/

The Appraisal Foundation. (n.d.). Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). https://www.appraisalfoundation.org/imis/TAF/Standards/Appraisal_Standards/Uniform_Standards_of_Professional_Appraisal_Practice/TAF/USPAP.aspx

U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). North American Industry Classification System. https://www.census.gov/naics/

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (n.d.). Non-GAAP financial measures. https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/staff-guidance/non-gaap-financial-measures

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Corporation Finance. (n.d.). Non-GAAP financial measures: Compliance and disclosure interpretations. https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/non-gaap-financial-measures

U.S. Small Business Administration. (n.d.). SOP 50 10: Lender and Development Company Loan Programs. https://www.sba.gov/document/sop-50-10-lender-development-company-loan-programs

Wall Street Prep. (n.d.). SDE: Seller’s discretionary earnings. https://www.wallstreetprep.com/knowledge/sde-sellers-discretionary-earnings/