Organic Growth Rates: The New Metric Driving Insurance Broker Valuations
Organic growth is not literally new to insurance agencies and brokerages. Strong producers, high retention, account rounding, and client referrals have mattered for decades. What is changing is the level of scrutiny. In a market where many agencies have grown through acquisitions, premium-rate increases, exposure inflation, contingent commissions, and technology-enabled reporting, buyers and appraisers increasingly want to know how much of reported growth is truly coming from the existing agency franchise.
That distinction matters in business valuation. A revenue line that grows because premiums rose in a hard market does not carry the same valuation weight as revenue that grows because the agency consistently wins new clients, retains profitable accounts, trains producers, cross-sells coverage, and converts growth into normalized EBITDA and free cash flow. Likewise, acquisition-driven growth can be valuable, but it must be separated from same-store organic growth so the appraiser can evaluate integration, retention, and transferability.
A credible valuation does not replace recognized valuation methods with a growth percentage. The income approach, market approach, and asset approach remain the broad framework an appraiser considers, and the discounted cash flow method is where the organic-growth story is converted into explicit cash-flow assumptions (Internal Revenue Service [IRS], 2020). Professional valuation standards and guidance from organizations such as AICPA & CIMA, NACVA, and the American Society of Appraisers also support careful scoping, documentation, assumptions, and reporting discipline (AICPA & CIMA, 2025; American Society of Appraisers [ASA], 2022; National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts [NACVA], n.d.).
Simply Business Valuation helps insurance agency owners, buyers, sellers, CPAs, attorneys, and advisers evaluate organic growth, retention, producer economics, normalized EBITDA, and valuation methods in a supportable business appraisal. This article explains how to define organic growth, separate real franchise growth from noise, and prepare the evidence a buyer or appraiser will need.
Quick Answer: How Organic Growth Affects Insurance Broker Value
Organic growth can support a higher valuation conclusion when it is durable, profitable, documented, diversified, and transferable. It can weaken the valuation story when it is driven mainly by rate increases, one-time contingent commissions, immediate inclusion of acquired books, a single rainmaker, or growth that requires margin-damaging reinvestment.
Key points:
- Organic growth is an input to business valuation, not a stand-alone valuation method.
- Reported revenue growth and organic growth are not the same.
- The appraiser should reconcile organic growth to the accounting records, agency management system, producer reports, lost-business data, renewal reports, and acquisition history.
- EBITDA still matters because valuation ultimately depends on earnings, cash flow, risk, and transferability, not revenue growth alone.
- In a discounted cash flow model, organic growth affects revenue forecasts, margin assumptions, reinvestment needs, working capital assumptions, and risk assessment.
- In the market approach, organic growth affects comparability and risk, but it should not be converted into an unsupported automatic multiple premium.
- The asset approach usually plays a smaller role for a profitable going-concern brokerage, but it can still matter for distressed agencies, working capital, debt-like items, identifiable assets and liabilities, and reasonableness checks.
Visual Aid 1: Practical Valuation Scenarios Near the Top
| Agency profile | Organic-growth pattern | Valuation implication | Main diligence questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate-tailwind agency | Revenue rose mostly because premiums increased | Growth may be less durable if market rates moderate | How much came from rate and exposure versus new clients and retention? |
| Producer-led growth agency | New business comes from multiple producers and niches | Can support stronger forecast confidence if margins and retention hold | Are producers under contract, incentivized, diversified, and transferable? |
| Acquisition-heavy agency | Reported growth mainly reflects purchased books | Appraiser should separate acquired revenue from same-store growth | Are acquisitions integrated, retained, and excluded under a defined convention? |
| Retention-driven agency | Stable renewals and low lost-business history | Supports revenue durability and discounted cash flow assumptions | Is retention measured by client, policy, premium, commission, or revenue? |
| Growth-with-margin-leakage agency | Revenue rises while EBITDA margin falls | Higher growth may not increase value unless economics improve | Are service costs, producer compensation, and carrier commissions sustainable? |
What Organic Growth Means in an Insurance Agency or Brokerage
Start With the Industry Scope
The U.S. Census Bureau classifies NAICS 524210, Insurance Agencies and Brokerages, as establishments primarily engaged in acting as agents or brokers in selling annuities and insurance policies (U.S. Census Bureau, 2022). That broad description covers many different business models, including independent retail property and casualty agencies, employee benefits brokers, personal-lines agencies, franchise models, wholesale and specialty distributors, program administrators, and hybrid firms.
Because these business models differ, the same organic-growth percentage can mean different things. A commercial P/C agency may be affected by property-rate cycles and client payroll exposures. A benefits brokerage may depend more heavily on renewal cycles, consulting fees, employee counts, and carrier arrangements. A wholesale specialty distributor may evaluate growth through carrier access, underwriting authority, submission flow, and relationships with retail brokers. A personal-lines franchise model may emphasize renewal revenue, client retention, and new business from franchisees.
For valuation purposes, the first step is not to ask whether organic growth is high or low. The first step is to define exactly what the subject company means by organic growth.
Organic Growth Versus Reported Revenue Growth
Reported revenue growth is the period-over-period change in revenue on the financial statements. Organic growth is a more selective concept. In a private insurance agency valuation, a practical working definition is:
Organic growth is the change in commission, fee, and related recurring revenue generated by the existing business after excluding or separately analyzing acquired revenue, divestitures, unusual one-time items, and other non-comparable components, and after considering rate, exposure, retention, new business, and contingent-commission effects.
That definition is intentionally described as practical rather than official. There is no single universal private-agency organic-growth formula. Public broker filings demonstrate why definitions must be read carefully. For example, Marsh & McLennan discusses underlying revenue as a non-GAAP measure used to compare performance across periods, while Brown & Brown defines Organic Revenue by starting with core commissions and fees and excluding first-12-month acquired operations, divested business, and foreign-currency translation; Brown & Brown also excludes profit-sharing contingent commissions from core commissions and fees (Brown & Brown, Inc., 2026; Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., 2026). Baldwin Insurance Group lists organic-growth factors such as net new business, fees, rate increases, retention, exposure unit growth, and contingent commissions, and states that recent partnerships begin contributing to organic revenue growth after the firm has owned the partner firm for 12 months (Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., 2026).
Those examples are not private-company rules. They are useful because they show that serious users of organic-growth metrics define the numerator, denominator, exclusions, timing, and reconciliation.
Organic Growth Is a Reconciliation Process
An appraiser should not accept a single percentage without the bridge behind it. The bridge should show how beginning revenue became ending revenue and which components are considered organic, nonorganic, unusual, or separately analyzed.
Visual Aid 2: Organic Revenue Bridge Table
| Bridge item | Include in organic growth? | Valuation question | Typical support documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retained renewal commission and fee revenue | Usually yes, if consistently measured | Is it recurring, profitable, and transferable? | Renewal reports, expiration lists, client retention reports |
| Net new business from existing producers | Usually yes | Is growth repeatable and profitable? | Production reports, producer scorecards, pipeline reports |
| Cross-sell and account rounding | Usually yes | Is growth from a systematic process or a one-time cleanup? | CRM records, policy counts, product penetration reports |
| Premium-rate changes | Analyze separately | Is growth market-driven or agency-driven? | Carrier rate notices, premium trend reports, line-of-business reports |
| Exposure-unit changes | Analyze separately | Are clients expanding or simply increasing insured values, payroll, or sales? | Client exposure data, policy schedules, client industry reports |
| Contingent or profit-sharing commissions | Often separate or normalized | Is the amount recurring or cycle-dependent? | Carrier statements, historical contingent commission schedules |
| First-year acquired revenue | Usually excluded from same-store organic metric | Is reported growth acquisition-driven? | Acquisition closing statements, acquired-book revenue detail |
| Divestitures or sold books | Exclude or normalize consistently | Was decline due to sale, producer departure, or retention failure? | Sale documents, lost-business reports, producer transition memos |
The bridge also helps prevent a common error: calling all revenue growth organic because it happened after the acquisition date or because the accounting system does not separately track acquired books. If the valuation depends on sustainability, the bridge needs to identify the drivers.
Why Organic Growth Is Now a Buyer and Appraiser Focus
Consolidation Makes Growth Quality More Important
Insurance distribution M&A has remained active, even though deal volume has moderated from prior highs. Optis Partners reported 695 total announced agent and broker deals in 2025, down 12% from 787 in 2024 and 24% below the previous five-year average. The same January 2026 report stated that retail, wholesale, and TPA transactions totaled 640 and that private-equity or hybrid buyers completed 73% of 2025 transactions (Optis Partners, 2026a). In its first-quarter 2026 update, Optis reported 148 announced transactions, down 6% from Q1 2025 and 16% below the previous five-year Q1 average (Optis Partners, 2026b).
Those figures are useful only as M&A activity context. They do not prove a valuation multiple. They do, however, help explain why buyers ask more sophisticated questions. When many buyers can compare agencies across markets, lines of business, revenue size, producer depth, and acquisition history, the quality of organic growth becomes a diligence issue. A buyer wants to know whether the growth will remain after the deal closes.
Benchmark Programs Put Organic Growth on the Operating Scorecard
The Big I and Reagan Consulting 2025 Best Practices Study public release is another reason the metric receives attention. The release states that the 2025 Best Practices agencies reported 10.7% organic growth, 26.1% EBITDA margins, a Rule of 20 result of 25.1, sales velocity above the 12% to 13% threshold described by the release in all revenue categories, net unvalidated producer payroll of 2.0% compared with 1.9% in 2024, and revenue per employee of $228,321 (Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America & Reagan Consulting, 2025).
Those are Best Practices agency metrics. They should not be presented as industry-wide averages or automatic valuation targets. The valuation lesson is narrower and more practical: buyers and appraisers care about the connection among growth, profitability, producer reinvestment, and productivity. Organic growth becomes more persuasive when it is accompanied by stable margins, producer development, client retention, and clear operating data.
Practitioner Commentary Supports the Theme, With Attribution
MarshBerry’s 2025 commentary states that organic growth has taken center stage as a leading driver of insurance brokerage value and emphasizes that not all organic growth is equal because growth must be profitable and sustainable (MarshBerry, 2025). That is useful practitioner commentary, but it is not a valuation standard, legal rule, or universal pricing formula. In a publication-ready business appraisal, the statement should be treated as an industry adviser viewpoint and combined with the subject company’s data and recognized valuation methods.
Public Broker Examples: Definitions Differ, So Reconciliation Matters
Why Public-Company Examples Are Useful but Limited
Public-company filings are helpful because large brokers disclose metric definitions, adjustments, and non-GAAP context. They are limited because public companies differ from small and middle-market private agencies in size, liquidity, capital access, reporting systems, acquisition programs, geography, and business mix.
The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance maintains staff guidance on non-GAAP financial measures for public-company disclosure contexts (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC], 2022). A private agency is not automatically subject to those public-company disclosure rules. Still, the underlying discipline is valuable: if management uses an adjusted metric such as organic revenue, underlying revenue, adjusted EBITDA, or adjusted EBITDAC, users need to understand the definition and reconciliation.
Visual Aid 3: Public-Company Organic-Growth Definition Comparison
| Source or company | Metric terminology | What the example teaches a private-agency valuation | Drafting caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marsh & McLennan | Underlying revenue | Non-GAAP performance measures can help compare performance across periods when defined | Do not treat the definition as a private-agency rule |
| Aon | Organic revenue growth | Aon reported 2025 revenue growth that reflected 6% organic revenue growth driven by net new business and retention, among other items | Cite as Aon-specific 2025 disclosure only |
| Gallagher | Organic revenue growth | Gallagher states it historically views organic revenue growth as an important indicator for brokerage and risk-management segment performance | Do not convert this into a private-agency multiple |
| Brown & Brown | Organic Revenue and core commissions and fees | Excluding first-12-month acquired operations, divested business, foreign currency, and profit-sharing contingent commissions illustrates a clean bridge | Company-specific non-GAAP definition |
| WTW | Organic revenue growth | Adjustments for currency, acquisitions, and disposals show comparability discipline | Broader advisory firm, not a typical small agency |
| Baldwin Insurance Group | Organic-growth factors | Rate increases, retention, exposure units, fees, contingents, and post-acquisition timing all need analysis | Company-specific and includes multiple growth drivers |
| Goosehead | Core revenue, new business revenue, renewal revenue, client retention | Personal-lines and franchise model highlights renewal dynamics and retention measurement | Business model differs from many independent agencies |
Public filings show that organic-growth analysis is not just a headline number. Aon reported that 2025 revenue increased to $17.2 billion and reflected 6% organic revenue growth driven by net new business and strong retention, among other items, including acquired revenues from NFP (Aon plc, 2026). Gallagher states that it has historically viewed organic revenue growth as an important indicator when evaluating brokerage and risk-management segment performance (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., 2026). WTW reports organic revenue growth after adjusting for foreign currency and acquisitions and disposals (Willis Towers Watson plc, 2026). Ryan Specialty states that it seeks acquisition partners with a strong track record of organic revenue growth, among other attributes (Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc., 2026). Goosehead distinguishes new business revenue, renewal revenue, and client retention within its model-specific disclosures (Goosehead Insurance, Inc., 2026).
For private agencies, the takeaway is simple: write the definition before using the metric. The definition should specify the measurement period, revenue basis, acquired revenue convention, contingent-commission treatment, divestiture treatment, producer book transfers, rate and exposure analysis, and whether the metric is measured on revenue, commissions, fees, premiums, clients, policies, or another basis.
Organic Growth Quality: Not Every Growth Dollar Deserves the Same Valuation Weight
Five Dimensions of Quality
A growth number becomes valuation evidence only when it has quality. Five dimensions are especially important.
1. Repeatability. Does growth come from a repeatable sales process, producer pipeline, niche market, referral engine, cross-sell process, or service model? Or did it come from a few unusual wins?
2. Controllability. Is the agency creating growth through retention, client acquisition, producer development, carrier relationships, specialization, and operations? Or is it mainly benefiting from premium-rate increases and client exposure changes outside the agency’s control?
3. Profitability. Does growth convert into normalized EBITDA and free cash flow after producer compensation, account management, claims advocacy, technology, compliance, and servicing costs?
4. Transferability. Would the revenue remain after an ownership change, producer transition, or founder retirement? Are client relationships institutionalized or owner-dependent?
5. Documentation. Can the agency reproduce the growth bridge from its agency management system, CRM, accounting records, carrier statements, and producer reports?
Visual Aid 4: Growth-Quality and Valuation-Risk Matrix
| Growth source | Repeatability | Controllability | Margin conversion | Buyer confidence | Valuation risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retained renewals with documented account ownership | High if retention history is stable | Medium to high | Often favorable if service load is controlled | High | Lower, subject to concentration and carrier risk |
| New business from multiple trained producers | Medium to high | High | Depends on compensation and ramp cost | High if producer bench is durable | Moderate if producer retention is weak |
| Rate-driven premium increases | Low to medium | Low | Can be favorable short term | Mixed | Higher if rates soften |
| Exposure-unit growth from clients | Medium | Low to medium | Often favorable if clients retain | Moderate | Depends on client industries and cyclicality |
| One-time contingent commissions | Low | Low | Can be high in the period received | Low unless history is stable | High if capitalized as recurring EBITDA |
| Acquired book revenue | Depends on integration | Medium | Depends on retention and synergies | Mixed until seasoned | Higher before post-close retention is proven |
Red Flags That Weaken the Value Story
Organic growth is less persuasive when the evidence shows one or more of these issues:
- One producer, owner, or niche controls most new business.
- The organic-growth percentage excludes lost business but includes rate increases without disclosure.
- Acquired books are included immediately as organic without a defined seasoning convention.
- Contingent commissions are treated as recurring without multi-year support.
- EBITDA margin declines while revenue grows.
- Retention is measured inconsistently across clients, policies, premiums, commissions, and revenue.
- Management cannot reproduce the metric from source systems.
- The forecast assumes rate increases or exposure inflation will continue without support.
- The agency has material carrier, client, producer, or line-of-business concentration that is not reflected in risk assessment.
These are not automatic valuation discounts. They are diligence issues. The valuation professional still needs to evaluate the facts, purpose, standard of value, scope, and available evidence.
Separating Rate Tailwinds From Real Franchise Growth
Why the Rate Environment Matters
Insurance agencies and brokerages often earn commissions or fees connected to premiums and policy activity. Therefore, premium-rate changes and exposure changes can increase commission revenue even if the agency does not add clients or policies. That does not make the revenue worthless. It means the source of growth must be identified.
The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers reported that premiums across all account sizes rose 1.6% in Q3 2025, a 57% decrease from the prior quarter’s 3.7% increase. The same Q3 2025 survey page stated that commercial property premiums decreased by 0.2%, the first decrease since Q2 2017, and that cyber premiums fell by an average of 2.6% (Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers [CIAB], 2025). Those figures are not valuation-pricing evidence. They show why an appraiser should avoid assuming that rate-driven growth will persist indefinitely.
Visual Aid 5: Rate-Tailwind Isolation Matrix
| Revenue change driver | How it can appear in reported growth | What the appraiser should test | Valuation implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrier premium-rate increases | Higher commissions on the same policies | Compare rate changes by line to agency revenue movement | May be less durable if market rates soften |
| Exposure-unit inflation | Higher insured values, payroll, sales, or units | Analyze client exposure units, not just commission revenue | May be tied to client economic cycles |
| Client count growth | More accounts and policies | Track new clients and policy count separately | Stronger support if retention holds |
| Cross-sell and account rounding | More policies or coverage lines per client | Review policy count, coverage mix, and CRM evidence | Higher quality if systematic and profitable |
| Producer-sourced new business | New accounts from agency activity | Review producer scorecards and pipeline conversion | Higher quality if spread across producers |
| Acquired books | Step-up in revenue after acquisition | Exclude or season acquired revenue under a defined convention | Needs integration and retention proof |
Practical Rate-Normalization Questions
A buyer or appraiser should ask:
- What percentage of revenue growth came from premium-rate changes by line of business?
- Did carrier commission percentages change?
- Did client exposure bases increase because of payroll, sales, property values, or inflation?
- Did the agency gain clients, policies, or coverage lines, or did it earn more on existing policies?
- Are contingent commissions unusually high because of carrier profitability, loss ratios, or book mix?
- Does the management forecast assume continued rate increases?
- How would revenue and EBITDA change if premiums flatten or decline in key lines?
A DCF forecast built on these questions is stronger than a forecast that simply extends the historical growth percentage.
How Organic Growth Enters the Income Approach and Discounted Cash Flow
DCF Is Where the Growth Story Becomes a Cash-Flow Forecast
The income approach values a business interest based on the economic benefits expected from ownership. A discounted cash flow model estimates future cash flows and discounts them to present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. IRS valuation guidance identifies the income approach, market approach, and asset-based approach as generally accepted valuation approaches and notes that professional judgment should be used to select the approaches and methods that best indicate value (IRS, 2020).
Organic growth enters the DCF in several places:
- Revenue forecast by line, producer, client segment, and acquisition cohort.
- Retention and lost-business assumptions.
- New business production assumptions.
- Cross-sell and account-rounding assumptions.
- Rate and exposure assumptions.
- Contingent commission normalization.
- Producer compensation and hiring plans.
- Account management and service staffing needs.
- Technology, compliance, and operating infrastructure investment.
- Working capital, debt-like adjustments, and nonoperating items.
- Specific company risk, key-person risk, concentration risk, and forecast uncertainty.
Visual Aid 6: DCF Driver Framework
Existing renewal revenue
- Lost business and expected attrition
+ New business from producers, referrals, niches, and cross-sell
+/- Rate and exposure changes that are separately supported
+/- Fee changes, carrier commission changes, and contingent normalization
= Forecast commission and fee revenue
Forecast commission and fee revenue
- Producer compensation, service staffing, technology, occupancy, and overhead
= Normalized EBITDA or operating income starting point
- Taxes, working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other cash-flow adjustments
= Expected free cash flow for discounted cash flow analysis
This framework is illustrative. A valuation professional may use different line items depending on the subject agency, valuation purpose, standard of value, financial statement basis, and available documents.
Build the Revenue Forecast From Drivers, Not Slogans
A management presentation that says “organic growth will continue” is not enough. The appraiser needs driver-level support. The forecast should separate existing renewal revenue from net new business, cross-sell, rate effects, exposure changes, fee changes, contingent commissions, and acquired revenue. Baldwin’s public filing is a useful example because it identifies multiple organic-growth factors, including net new business, fees, rate increases, retention, exposure unit growth, and contingent commissions (Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., 2026). Brown & Brown’s filing is also useful because its definition excludes first-12-month acquired operations and divested business from Organic Revenue (Brown & Brown, Inc., 2026).
A private agency can adopt a simpler version, but it still needs consistency. For example, if acquired revenue is excluded for the first 12 months, the same convention should be applied across periods. If contingent commissions are excluded from core revenue, the EBITDA bridge should explain how they are treated elsewhere.
Connect Growth to EBITDA and Free Cash Flow
Valuation does not capitalize revenue growth alone. It values expected cash flows or earnings, adjusted for risk and the selected valuation methods. EBITDA is commonly discussed in insurance-agency transactions because it approximates operating earnings before financing, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. But EBITDA is only useful if it is normalized and connected to sustainable operations.
A high-growth agency may still have a weak valuation case if growth requires unsustainable producer guarantees, excess service staffing, high account churn, or one-time carrier incentives. Conversely, a slower-growth agency may have a stronger valuation case if its revenue is highly retained, diversified, transferable, and profitable. The key is not growth in isolation. The key is risk-adjusted, transferable cash flow.
Visual Aid 7: Discounted Cash Flow Scenario Table
| Scenario | Forecast assumption | What changes in the model | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable organic-growth case | Historical retention and producer output continue with support | Higher revenue forecast with stable margins | Supports stronger cash-flow outlook if evidence is credible |
| Rate-reversion case | Premium-rate tailwinds moderate | Revenue growth and possibly contingent commissions decline | Tests whether growth is market-driven |
| Producer-departure case | Key producer leaves or book transfer weakens | New business slows and retention risk increases | Tests key-person and transferability risk |
| Retention-stress case | Lost business rises after ownership change or service issues | Revenue and EBITDA decline | Tests durability of client relationships |
| Margin-investment case | Growth requires hiring producers, account managers, and technology | EBITDA margin compresses before improving | Tests whether growth creates cash flow, not just revenue |
Discount Rate and Specific Risk Implications
A strong organic-growth record may reduce forecast uncertainty when it is documented, diversified, profitable, and transferable. It may increase valuation risk when it is unverifiable, owner-dependent, rate-driven, acquisition-driven, or margin-negative. The appraiser should not pick a discount rate solely because organic growth is high. Instead, the appraiser should evaluate the evidence behind the growth and the risks that could prevent forecast cash flows from being realized.
How Organic Growth Affects EBITDA Normalization
EBITDA Is Not Self-Explanatory
EBITDA can be a useful earnings metric, but it is not self-explanatory in an insurance brokerage valuation. Normalized EBITDA should reflect the ongoing economics of the agency after reasonable adjustments for nonrecurring, nonoperating, or non-market items. Professional valuation standards and guidance support careful documentation of assumptions and adjustments (AICPA & CIMA, 2025; ASA, 2022; NACVA, n.d.).
Potential adjustments may include:
- Owner or officer compensation and benefits.
- Related-party rent or management fees.
- Nonrecurring legal, consulting, transaction, or restructuring costs.
- Unusually high or low contingent commissions.
- Producer compensation normalization.
- Deferred compensation or retention bonuses.
- Acquisition and integration costs, if nonrecurring and supportable.
- Technology implementation costs.
- Understaffing or overstaffing in account management and service teams.
- Nonoperating expenses, income, assets, or liabilities.
No adjustment should be made merely because it increases value. Every adjustment needs evidence and professional judgment.
Visual Aid 8: Normalized EBITDA Bridge
Reported EBITDA
+/- Owner and officer compensation normalization
+/- Related-party rent, management fees, or non-market charges
+/- Nonrecurring or nonoperating expenses and income
+/- Unusual contingent or profit-sharing commissions
+/- Producer compensation normalization
+/- Acquisition and integration costs, if nonrecurring and supportable
+/- Technology or service-capacity adjustments needed for sustainable growth
= Normalized EBITDA for valuation analysis
Organic Growth Without EBITDA Conversion Can Be a Warning
The Big I and Reagan Consulting release reported 26.1% EBITDA margins for 2025 Best Practices agencies, with the important caveat that these are Best Practices agencies and not the whole market (Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America & Reagan Consulting, 2025). A private agency should not copy that number as a valuation target. Instead, the agency should use its own normalized EBITDA bridge to show whether organic growth is converting into earnings.
If revenue grows but EBITDA declines, the appraiser should investigate why. The explanation may be value-enhancing investment, such as hiring producers and building service capacity for future growth. Or it may be a structural problem, such as unprofitable accounts, uncontrolled compensation, weak carrier economics, or inefficient operations. The valuation treatment depends on evidence, not optimism.
How Organic Growth Enters the Market Approach
Organic Growth Is a Comparability Factor, Not an Automatic Multiple Premium
The market approach compares the subject agency to transactions, guideline public companies, or other market evidence when reliable data are available. Organic growth can influence the selection, weighting, and interpretation of market evidence because it affects expected growth, risk, and buyer confidence. However, it should not be treated as an automatic multiple premium.
This article intentionally avoids generic insurance-agency revenue or EBITDA multiple ranges. Published multiple ranges are often date-specific, transaction-specific, size-specific, and affected by deal terms, earnouts, rollover equity, buyer strategy, tax structure, working capital, and quality of earnings. Without exact source support and context, broad multiple claims can mislead readers.
Visual Aid 9: Market Approach Adjustment Matrix
| Factor | Higher-quality evidence | Lower-quality evidence | Market approach implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic growth | Reconciled same-store growth by source | Single unsupported percentage | Stronger or weaker comparability support |
| EBITDA margin | Stable normalized EBITDA after growth investments | Margin decline hidden by aggressive add-backs | Affects selected earnings and risk |
| Retention | Multi-year retention by client, revenue, policy, and premium | Anecdotal “clients are loyal” claim | Affects revenue durability assessment |
| Producer bench | Multiple productive producers with documented pipelines | Owner or key-person dependence | Affects transferability and risk |
| Client concentration | Diversified client base | Few accounts drive revenue | Affects company-specific risk |
| Carrier access | Stable appointments and commission arrangements | Fragile or changing carrier relationships | Affects future revenue support |
| Contingent commissions | Multi-year pattern separately analyzed | One high year capitalized as recurring | Affects normalized earnings |
| Technology and process | Reliable AMS, CRM, and reporting workflows | Weak data quality | Affects due-diligence confidence |
| Acquisition integration | Seasoned acquired books retained after close | Recently acquired revenue mixed into organic metric | Affects growth quality and comparability |
Public-Company Metrics Should Not Be Pasted Into Private-Company Multiples
Public brokers can help appraisers understand how sophisticated companies define organic revenue, but public-company trading metrics are not directly interchangeable with private agency transaction pricing. Public companies may have greater diversification, liquidity, access to capital, acquisition infrastructure, and reporting systems. Private agencies may have greater owner dependence, client concentration, local market exposure, or less formal data. The market approach requires judgment about comparability.
The Asset Approach: Smaller Role, Still Important
When the Asset Approach Matters
For a profitable insurance agency operating as a going concern, income and market approaches are often more relevant than a pure asset approach because much of the value is tied to customer relationships, producer relationships, carrier access, renewal revenue, and expected earnings. Still, the asset approach should not be ignored automatically.
The asset approach may matter when:
- The agency is distressed or unprofitable.
- The agency owns meaningful tangible assets.
- Working capital, debt, nonoperating assets, or nonoperating liabilities require analysis.
- The valuation purpose requires asset-based consideration.
- Shareholder, buy-sell, or legal documents specify an approach or premise of value.
- Identifiable intangible assets are relevant to the engagement scope.
- The appraiser uses asset-based analysis as a reasonableness check.
IRS guidance identifies the asset-based approach as one of the generally accepted valuation approaches, along with the market and income approaches (IRS, 2020). The point is not that every agency valuation should rely on the asset approach. The point is that a credible business appraisal should explain why each approach was used, considered, or rejected.
Why Organic Growth Still Relates to Asset-Based Thinking
Organic growth can help evaluate whether customer relationships, trade names, niches, producer teams, carrier appointments, and renewal revenue streams have economic substance. Even if the final value conclusion relies mainly on income and market methods, organic-growth evidence can support the analysis of intangible value and going-concern strength.
Rule of 20, Sales Velocity, NUPP, and Other Operating Benchmarks
Rule of 20 Is a Benchmark, Not a Valuation Method
The Big I and Reagan Consulting release states that the Rule of 20 is calculated by adding organic growth to 50% of pro forma EBITDA and reported a 2025 Best Practices agency result of 25.1 (Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America & Reagan Consulting, 2025). The release also reports sales velocity above the 12% to 13% threshold described by the release in all revenue categories and NUPP of 2.0% compared with 1.9% in 2024.
Those metrics can be valuable operating benchmarks. They are not substitutes for a business valuation. An appraiser still needs to analyze cash flow, risk, assets and liabilities, comparability, retention, concentration, owner dependence, and the selected valuation methods.
Visual Aid 10: Operating Benchmark Warning Block
Operating benchmark concept:
Organic growth and pro forma EBITDA margin can be combined in a Rule of 20 style benchmark under the relevant benchmark program's definitions.
Valuation warning:
A benchmark score is not a valuation method.
It does not replace discounted cash flow analysis, market approach comparability, asset approach consideration, EBITDA normalization, or professional judgment.
Use the exact formula and definitions from the cited benchmark source before presenting any calculation.
Sales Velocity and Producer Investment
Sales velocity, producer hiring, producer validation, and NUPP are important because organic growth usually requires people. New producers can create future revenue, but they can also depress near-term EBITDA through compensation, training, support, and management time. A valuation model should not assume growth is free. It should connect producer investment to future production, retention, and margins.
Is This Real Organic Growth? A Practical Decision Tree
Visual Aid 11: Mermaid Decision Tree
This decision tree is not a mechanical valuation model. It is a diligence workflow that helps owners, buyers, and appraisers identify where the growth story needs support.
Documents and Data an Appraiser or Buyer Should Request
Visual Aid 12: Diligence Checklist
A well-prepared agency can improve valuation confidence by organizing the following documents before a sale, buyout, financing, succession plan, or business appraisal:
- Monthly commission and fee revenue by line of business for at least three to five years, if available.
- Renewal and expiration reports from the agency management system.
- New business reports by producer, line, niche, carrier, and month.
- Lost-business reports with reason codes.
- Client retention, policy retention, premium retention, and commission or revenue retention definitions.
- Producer scorecards, producer compensation plans, and employment or contract terms.
- Book-of-business ownership provisions and producer restrictive covenants, reviewed by counsel where relevant.
- Carrier appointment lists, commission schedules, and material carrier concentration data.
- Contingent or profit-sharing commission statements by carrier and year.
- Acquisition closing dates, acquired-book revenue, earnout terms, and integration reports.
- Divestiture or book-sale records.
- Revenue by client and client concentration schedules.
- Client industry and exposure data where rate and exposure analysis matters.
- Normalized EBITDA bridge and supporting general ledger detail.
- Working capital, debt, and nonoperating asset and liability schedules.
- Management forecast with assumptions for organic growth, retention, rate and exposure, producer hiring, margins, capital expenditures, and technology spending.
The point is not to overwhelm management. The point is to make the growth story reproducible. If the agency can produce the same organic-growth conclusion from the accounting system, AMS, CRM, and carrier data, buyers and appraisers have more confidence.
Owner Playbook: Improving Organic-Growth Evidence Before a Sale, Buyout, or Financing
90-Day Actions
In the next 90 days, an owner can take practical steps that improve valuation readiness:
- Define organic growth in writing.
- Reconcile reported revenue growth to organic growth for the trailing twelve months and prior fiscal years.
- Separate acquisitions, divestitures, contingents, rate and exposure changes, producer book transfers, and unusual items.
- Build a normalized EBITDA bridge with support.
- Identify data gaps in the accounting system, AMS, CRM, producer reports, and carrier statements.
- Document how retention is measured.
- Prepare a client and carrier concentration schedule.
Six-Month Actions
Over six months, the agency can strengthen the operating evidence behind its growth:
- Standardize producer reporting and pipeline tracking.
- Build retention reports by client, policy, premium, commission, and revenue.
- Review carrier concentration, commission schedules, and contingent commission history.
- Analyze which lines and niches show durable growth versus rate-driven growth.
- Document cross-sell, referral, and niche programs.
- Review producer compensation plans for alignment with profitable growth.
- Identify owner-dependent relationships that need transition plans.
Twelve-Month Actions
Over a longer horizon, owners can improve transferability and reduce risk:
- Build producer bench strength and account-management depth.
- Reduce founder or owner dependence.
- Improve client segmentation, retention workflows, and data quality.
- Strengthen documented processes for onboarding, renewal, claims advocacy, and cross-sell.
- Review acquisition integration reporting if the agency buys books or firms.
- Obtain a professional business valuation or updated business appraisal before negotiations, succession decisions, financing, or buy-sell events.
Visual Aid 13: Owner Action Plan Table
| Timeline | Action | Why it matters to valuation | Evidence to preserve |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90 days | Define and reconcile organic growth | Prevents buyer and appraiser confusion | Written definition, revenue bridge |
| 90 days | Normalize EBITDA | Links growth to earnings | GL detail, add-back support |
| 6 months | Standardize retention reporting | Supports revenue durability | Renewal and lost-business reports |
| 6 months | Analyze rate and exposure effects | Separates market tailwinds from execution | Carrier and line-of-business reports |
| 12 months | Build producer bench | Reduces key-person risk | Producer scorecards, compensation plans |
| 12 months | Obtain professional valuation | Supports planning and negotiation | Business appraisal, support schedules |
Practical Case Studies
Case Study 1: The Agency That Grew Because the Market Hardened
Assume a commercial P/C agency reports strong revenue growth over two years. At first glance, management presents the growth as evidence that the agency should command a premium valuation. But client count is flat, policy count is only slightly higher, and much of the revenue increase comes from commercial property rate increases and higher insured values.
A valuation professional should not dismiss the growth. Higher revenue may still improve earnings. However, the appraiser should build a rate and exposure bridge. CIAB’s Q3 2025 survey shows that premium changes can moderate and even decline in certain lines (CIAB, 2025). If the forecast assumes continued rate increases, the appraiser should test a rate-reversion case.
The analysis should also evaluate contingent commissions. If carrier profitability or volume contingents were unusually high during the period, normalized EBITDA may need adjustment. The valuation takeaway is that rate-driven growth may support value for the period earned, but it should not be treated as permanent franchise growth unless supported.
Case Study 2: The Producer-Led Growth Agency With EBITDA Conversion
Assume a middle-market agency generates new business from five producers across several niches. Retention is stable, lost-business reports are clean, and the agency can show monthly production by producer, line, carrier, and client segment. EBITDA margins remain stable after producer compensation and service staffing.
This growth story is stronger because it is diversified, documented, and profitable. The appraiser can use producer scorecards, pipeline reports, retention data, and normalized EBITDA to support the DCF forecast. In the market approach, this evidence may support stronger comparability to higher-quality agencies, although it still does not justify an unsupported automatic multiple premium.
The valuation takeaway is that organic growth is most persuasive when it is repeatable, profitable, and less dependent on a single person.
Case Study 3: The Acquisition-Heavy Brokerage With Overstated Organic Growth
Assume a brokerage reports rapid revenue growth after buying two books of business. Management includes all revenue from the acquired books in organic growth immediately. Post-acquisition retention has not yet been tested, and earnout terms may affect producer behavior.
A credible business appraisal would separate acquired revenue from same-store growth. Brown & Brown’s public-company definition illustrates one approach by excluding newly acquired operations for the first 12 months from Organic Revenue (Brown & Brown, Inc., 2026). Baldwin’s filing likewise describes a 12-month ownership convention for recent partnerships contributing to organic revenue growth (Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., 2026). A private agency is not required to copy either convention, but it should choose and disclose a consistent convention.
The valuation takeaway is that acquisition-driven growth can be valuable, but it is different from organic growth. The appraiser should analyze integration, retained acquired revenue, client transition, producer retention, earnout incentives, and operating synergies.
Case Study 4: The High-Growth Agency With Declining EBITDA
Assume an agency reports strong new business and cross-sell results, but EBITDA declines because the firm hired producers, added service staff, upgraded technology, and took on complex accounts with heavy service needs. Management asks the appraiser to value the agency as if mature margins already exist.
The appraiser should distinguish temporary growth investment from permanent margin structure. If the agency has a credible plan showing producers moving toward validation, service capacity normalizing, and retention improving, the DCF may include margin improvement. If the cost structure is necessary to keep the revenue, the current lower margin may be more representative.
The valuation takeaway is that organic growth is strongest when it produces sustainable cash flow. Growth that consumes cash without a clear return may increase risk.
Common Valuation Mistakes With Organic Growth
Mistake 1: Treating Organic Growth as a Valuation Method
Organic growth is a value driver and diligence metric. It is not a valuation method. A formal business valuation still needs to apply and reconcile appropriate valuation methods, such as discounted cash flow under the income approach, selected market approach methods, and asset approach analysis where relevant (IRS, 2020).
Mistake 2: Capitalizing Rate-Driven Growth as if It Were Permanent
Premium-rate increases can lift commission revenue. They can also moderate or reverse. CIAB’s Q3 2025 data is a reminder that market conditions can change by quarter and line of business (CIAB, 2025). Forecasts should separate controllable growth from market tailwinds.
Mistake 3: Mixing Acquisition Revenue With Same-Store Growth
Acquisitions are not bad. They just need separate analysis. If an agency includes acquired revenue in organic growth without disclosure, the appraiser may overestimate same-store growth and underestimate integration risk.
Mistake 4: Ignoring Contingent Commissions
Contingent or profit-sharing commissions can be meaningful, but they may be carrier-specific, loss-ratio-sensitive, or unusually high in a particular year. Brown & Brown’s filing illustrates the importance of separate treatment by excluding profit-sharing contingent commissions from core commissions and fees in its Organic Revenue framework (Brown & Brown, Inc., 2026). A private agency should analyze its own history and carrier statements.
Mistake 5: Using Public-Company Disclosures as Private-Company Formulas
Public-company filings illustrate metric discipline, but they do not prescribe private-company valuation formulas. A small agency should not copy a public broker’s definition without considering its own revenue streams, acquisition history, systems, and valuation purpose.
Mistake 6: Publishing Unsupported Multiple Ranges
Unsupported revenue or EBITDA multiple ranges can create false confidence. A valuation conclusion should be based on the subject agency, the valuation date, the standard and premise of value, financial analysis, risk assessment, and appropriate market evidence. If a market multiple is used, it should be supported by reliable data and adjusted for comparability.
Visual Aid 14: Common Mistake Risk Matrix
| Mistake | Consequence | Prevention step |
|---|---|---|
| Treating organic growth as value by itself | Overstates conclusion without method support | Reconcile to DCF, market approach, and asset approach |
| Ignoring rate and exposure | Forecast may overstate sustainable growth | Build line-by-line rate and exposure bridge |
| Mixing acquisitions into organic growth | Misleads buyer or appraiser about same-store performance | Separate acquired revenue and season acquired books |
| Capitalizing one high contingent year | EBITDA may be overstated | Review multi-year carrier statements |
| Ignoring producer dependence | Transferability risk is underestimated | Review producer concentration and agreements |
| Weak data support | Lower buyer confidence and more valuation risk | Preserve AMS, CRM, accounting, and carrier reports |
When to Get a Professional Business Valuation
Events Where a Business Appraisal May Be Useful
An insurance agency or brokerage should consider a professional business valuation when organic growth, EBITDA normalization, or transferability may materially affect decisions. Common events include:
- Sale, recapitalization, or partner buyout.
- Internal succession or producer equity plan.
- Buy-sell agreement update.
- Shareholder, member, or family ownership planning.
- Lender or investor diligence.
- Strategic planning and value-improvement roadmap.
- Gift and estate planning, if separately scoped with tax advisers.
- Litigation or disputes, if separately scoped with counsel.
The valuation engagement should be matched to the purpose. A planning valuation, transaction-support valuation, litigation valuation, and tax-related valuation may have different assumptions, standards, documentation, and reporting needs.
How Simply Business Valuation Helps
Simply Business Valuation helps insurance agency owners, buyers, sellers, CPAs, attorneys, and advisers evaluate organic growth, retention, producer economics, normalized EBITDA, and valuation methods in a supportable business appraisal. A professional valuation can help translate the agency’s growth story into a disciplined analysis of cash flow, risk, comparability, and value.
For owners preparing for a sale or internal transition, the benefit is not only the value conclusion. The process can reveal data gaps, margin issues, retention concerns, producer dependence, and growth-quality questions before a buyer or lender discovers them.
FAQ: Organic Growth and Insurance Broker Valuation
1. What does organic growth mean in an insurance agency valuation?
Organic growth generally means growth generated by the existing agency business after excluding or separately analyzing items such as acquired revenue, divestitures, unusual one-time items, and non-comparable components. In insurance agency valuation, the appraiser should also analyze retention, new business, cross-sell, rate changes, exposure changes, contingent commissions, and producer book transfers. There is no single universal private-agency formula, so the definition should be written and reconciled.
2. Is organic growth the same as total revenue growth?
No. Total revenue growth is the overall increase in revenue. Organic growth tries to isolate growth from the existing business. A brokerage may report strong total growth because it acquired books, benefited from premium-rate increases, earned unusual contingents, or changed reporting. Those factors may be valuable, but they should not automatically be treated as same-store organic growth.
3. Why do buyers care about organic growth in insurance brokerages?
Buyers care because organic growth can indicate whether the agency has durable client relationships, producer productivity, niche strength, cross-sell capabilities, and a transferable sales engine. In public-company filings, Ryan Specialty states that it seeks acquisition partners with a strong track record of organic revenue growth among other attributes, which illustrates that growth quality is a buyer-screening consideration in insurance distribution (Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc., 2026).
4. Does higher organic growth automatically mean a higher valuation?
No. Higher organic growth can support value when it is sustainable, profitable, documented, diversified, and transferable. It may not support value if it is rate-driven, owner-dependent, acquisition-driven, margin-negative, or unsupported. A valuation professional still needs to analyze income approach, market approach, and asset approach considerations.
5. How do premium-rate increases affect reported organic growth?
Premium-rate increases can raise commission revenue even if the agency does not add clients. The appraiser should separate rate effects from client count growth, policy growth, cross-sell, producer new business, and exposure-unit changes. CIAB’s Q3 2025 survey shows that rate conditions can moderate and vary by line, which supports stress testing rather than assuming rate tailwinds continue indefinitely (CIAB, 2025).
6. Should contingent commissions be included in organic growth?
It depends on the definition and evidence. Contingent commissions may be recurring for some agencies, but they can also vary with carrier profitability, loss ratios, growth incentives, and book mix. Brown & Brown’s public-company definition excludes profit-sharing contingent commissions from core commissions and fees for its Organic Revenue measure, which illustrates one way to separate the item (Brown & Brown, Inc., 2026). A private agency should analyze its own multi-year carrier statements.
7. How should acquired revenue be treated when measuring organic growth?
Acquired revenue should usually be separated or seasoned under a defined convention so the appraiser can distinguish same-store growth from acquisition growth. Public-company examples show different approaches. Brown & Brown excludes newly acquired operations for the first 12 months from Organic Revenue, while Baldwin states that recent partnerships begin contributing to organic revenue growth after 12 months (Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., 2026; Brown & Brown, Inc., 2026). Private agencies should choose a consistent convention and disclose it.
8. How does organic growth affect a discounted cash flow valuation?
Organic growth affects the DCF through revenue forecasts, retention assumptions, new business assumptions, rate and exposure assumptions, contingent commission normalization, producer compensation, service staffing, working capital, reinvestment, and risk. The appraiser should convert the growth story into supportable cash-flow assumptions rather than simply extending a historical percentage.
9. How does organic growth affect EBITDA normalization?
Organic growth affects EBITDA normalization because growth may require producer compensation, service capacity, technology, carrier support, or acquisition integration costs. The appraiser should determine whether those costs are temporary investments or recurring costs required to maintain the revenue. Normalized EBITDA should reflect sustainable operations.
10. How does the market approach use organic growth?
The market approach may use organic growth as a comparability and risk factor. Agencies with documented, profitable, diversified organic growth may be more comparable to stronger market evidence than agencies with weak or unsupported growth. However, organic growth should not be applied as an unsupported automatic multiple premium.
11. Does the asset approach matter for insurance agencies?
Yes, but usually as a secondary or situational approach for profitable going-concern agencies. The asset approach can matter for distressed agencies, working capital, debt-like items, nonoperating assets and liabilities, tangible assets, identified intangible assets, or documents that require asset-based analysis. IRS guidance identifies the asset-based approach as one of the generally accepted approaches (IRS, 2020).
12. What documents prove organic growth to an appraiser or buyer?
Useful documents include monthly revenue by line, renewal and expiration reports, new business reports by producer, lost-business reports, retention definitions, producer scorecards, carrier commission schedules, contingent commission statements, acquisition closing dates, acquired-book revenue reports, client concentration schedules, and the normalized EBITDA bridge.
13. What is the Rule of 20, and is it a valuation method?
The Big I and Reagan Consulting release describes the Rule of 20 as adding organic growth to 50% of pro forma EBITDA and reports a 2025 Best Practices agency result of 25.1 (Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America & Reagan Consulting, 2025). It is an operating benchmark, not a formal valuation method. A business valuation still requires income, market, and asset approach analysis as appropriate.
14. How can an agency improve organic-growth quality before a sale?
The agency can define organic growth, reconcile revenue, standardize retention reports, separate rate and exposure effects, document producer production, build a normalized EBITDA bridge, reduce owner dependence, strengthen producer bench depth, and preserve source documents. Improving the evidence often matters as much as improving the headline percentage.
15. When should an insurance agency get a professional business appraisal?
An agency should consider a professional business appraisal before a sale, internal succession, shareholder buyout, buy-sell agreement update, financing, strategic planning, gift or estate planning, or dispute. A valuation can also help owners identify weaknesses in organic-growth evidence before negotiations begin.
Conclusion
Organic growth is one of the most important questions in insurance broker valuation because it helps separate durable franchise performance from noise. But it is not magic. It must be defined, reconciled, documented, and translated into valuation methods.
A strong organic-growth story answers practical questions. Did the agency retain clients? Did it win new business from repeatable sources? Did growth come from producers and niches rather than only premium-rate increases? Were acquisitions separated? Were contingents normalized? Did revenue growth convert into EBITDA and free cash flow? Can management reproduce the metric from source records?
When the answers are strong, organic growth can support more credible discounted cash flow forecasts, stronger market approach comparability, and lower perceived risk. When the answers are weak, the same growth percentage can become a red flag.
Simply Business Valuation helps owners and advisers evaluate these issues in a supportable business valuation or business appraisal. If your insurance agency is preparing for a sale, buyout, financing, succession plan, or strategic valuation review, organize the growth bridge now. The earlier you define and prove organic growth, the better prepared you will be when value is on the line.
References
AICPA & CIMA. (2025). Statement on Standards for Valuation Services (VS Section 100). https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/download/statement-on-standards-for-valuation-services-vs-section-100
Aon plc. (2026, February 13). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/315293/000162828026008116/aon-20251231.htm
American Society of Appraisers. (2022). ASA business valuation standards. https://www.appraisers.org/docs/default-source/5---standards/bv-standards-feb-2022.pdf
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (2026, February 17). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/354190/000162828026008662/ajg-20251231.htm
Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (2026, February 26). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1781755/000178175526000018/bwin-20251231.htm
Brown & Brown, Inc. (2026, February 12). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/79282/000119312526046984/bro-20251231.htm
Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers. (2025, November 17). Q3 2025 P/C Market Survey. https://www.ciab.com/resources/soft-market-clear-in-q3-2025-according-to-the-council-of-insurance-agents-brokers-quarterly-p-c-market-survey/
Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (2026, February 19). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1726978/000172697826000010/gshd-20251231.htm
Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America & Reagan Consulting. (2025, August 12). Big “I” and Reagan Consulting release 2025 Best Practices Study. https://www.independentagent.com/news/big-i-and-reagan-consulting-release-2025-best-practices-study/
Internal Revenue Service. (2020, September 22). 4.48.4 Business valuation guidelines. https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-048-004
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (2026, February 9). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000006270926000022/mrsh-20251231.htm
MarshBerry. (2025, October 1). The long game: Creating lasting value in an insurance brokerage. https://www.marshberry.com/resource/how-to-increase-insurance-brokerage-value/
National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts. (n.d.). Professional standards and ethics. https://www.nacva.com/standards
Optis Partners. (2026a, January). North American agent & broker 2025 year-end merger & acquisition report. https://optisins.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Year-End-2025-MA-Report-2.pdf
Optis Partners. (2026b, April). North American agent & broker merger & acquisition update: 1st quarter 2026. https://optisins.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/March-2026-MA-Report.pdf
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. (2026, February 13). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1849253/000184925326000006/ryan-20251231.htm
U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). 2022 NAICS descriptions. https://www.census.gov/naics/2022NAICS/2022_NAICS_Descriptions.xlsx
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2022, December 13). Non-GAAP financial measures. https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/staff-guidance/corporation-finance-interpretations/non-gaap-financial-measures
Willis Towers Watson plc. (2026, February 25). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1140536/000119312526069307/wtw-20251231.htm