Staffing Agency Valuations: Contract Staffing Versus Permanent Placement Revenue
Staffing agency valuations should start with revenue quality, not headline revenue. A contract staffing business, a temporary staffing branch, a direct-hire search firm, and a retained executive search boutique may all be called staffing or recruiting companies, but they do not create cash flow in the same way. Contract staffing revenue is usually driven by billable hours, bill rates, pay rates, assignment length, payroll burden, client collections, and the ability to keep workers deployed. Permanent placement revenue is usually driven by completed placements, recruiter productivity, client hiring demand, fee agreements, and the durability of candidate and client relationships.
That difference matters because business valuation is about expected economic benefit and risk. A contract-heavy agency can have large gross billings but tight spreads, significant payroll funding needs, customer receivable exposure, workers compensation costs, and safety or classification diligence issues. A placement-heavy agency can show attractive gross margins, but its revenue may be more episodic, more sensitive to hiring freezes, and more dependent on a few rainmakers. A balanced platform may be more resilient, but only if management can prove the mix, margins, systems, compliance, and client relationships behind the revenue.
The right valuation methods depend on facts. A discounted cash flow model may be helpful when the appraiser can forecast contract staffing and permanent placement revenue separately. A market approach can be useful when comparable companies or transactions are genuinely similar in revenue mix, vertical specialization, size, margin, growth, and risk. An asset approach is often a supporting method for profitable staffing agencies, but it is still important because accounts receivable, payroll liabilities, workers compensation reserves, factoring lines, and nonoperating assets can materially affect equity value. IRS business valuation guidance recognizes the income, market, and asset-based approaches and emphasizes professional judgment in selecting the method or methods that best indicate value (Internal Revenue Service, 2020).
This article explains how to value a staffing agency when contract staffing and permanent placement revenue are both in the picture. It is written for business owners, buyers, sellers, lenders, CPAs, attorneys, and advisers who need practical valuation guidance without unsupported multiples or one-size-fits-all rules.
Quick Answer: Why Revenue Mix Changes a Staffing Agency Valuation
Contract staffing and permanent placement revenue are valued differently because they have different cash-flow mechanics. The issue is not that one model is automatically better. The issue is that each model affects revenue durability, gross profit, EBITDA quality, working capital, compliance risk, and buyer comparability differently.
Public staffing company filings illustrate the terminology. Robert Half reports contract talent solutions and permanent placement talent solutions as separate segment terminology (Robert Half Inc., 2026). Kforce describes temporary or assignment-based talent solutions as Flex and permanent placement roles as Direct Hire (Kforce Inc., 2026). Kelly Services discusses temporary staffing, outcome-based services, and permanent placement fees; in its company-specific filing, Kelly states that permanent placement fees represent approximately 1% of its revenue and typically have a higher gross margin than staffing services (Kelly Services, Inc., 2026). ManpowerGroup describes contingent staffing and permanent recruitment, and TrueBlue discusses changes in revenue mix and workers compensation reserve adjustments in the context of gross profit margin (ManpowerGroup Inc., 2026; TrueBlue, Inc., 2026).
Those public-company filings are useful for vocabulary and business-model mechanics. They are not a shortcut for valuing a small privately held staffing agency. A local healthcare staffing firm, an IT contract staffing agency, a light industrial temporary staffing branch, and an owner-led executive search boutique can have very different risk profiles even if they all use staffing language.
Visual Aid 1: Revenue Model Comparison
| Revenue model | How revenue is usually earned | Why buyers may like it | Main valuation risks | Diligence focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract staffing, temporary staffing, flex staffing | Billable worker hours multiplied by bill rates, less pay rates and direct assignment costs | Repeat client needs, assignment-level visibility, measurable bill-rate/pay-rate spread | Payroll funding, receivables aging, workers compensation, safety, client concentration, MSP/VMS pricing pressure | Hours, bill rates, pay rates, burden, A/R, loss runs, contract terms |
| Direct hire and permanent placement | Fee earned when a candidate accepts or starts a permanent role, depending on agreement terms | Potentially higher gross margin and less direct payroll funding | Episodic demand, replacement guarantees, recruiter dependency, hiring-cycle sensitivity | Placements by recruiter, repeat clients, guarantee claims, fee collections, pipeline |
| Retained search and professional search | Retainer, milestone, or success-based search fees depending on engagement terms | Better visibility than purely contingent search if retainers are meaningful | Longer sales cycles, small number of assignments, key-person exposure | Engagement letters, retainers, completion history, client relationship transferability |
| RPO, MSP, on-site, workforce solutions | Contracted recruiting, managed service, or workforce program services | Enterprise relationship, potential recurring service revenue, account stickiness | Implementation complexity, service-level obligations, pricing pressure, enterprise concentration | Contract scope, service levels, term and termination, gross profit by account |
| Consulting, project, interim, or staff augmentation work | Fees from project engagements, interim roles, or defined outcomes | Specialized skill sets and potentially stronger client relationships | Scope delivery risk, talent scarcity, consulting comparability issues | Statement of work terms, utilization, project margins, renewal history |
A defensible business appraisal therefore begins with segmentation. Before using EBITDA, revenue, a discounted cash flow model, market evidence, or any asset approach adjustment, the appraiser should know what type of revenue is being valued.
Define the Revenue Streams Before Applying Valuation Methods
Contract Staffing, Temporary Staffing, and Flex Revenue
Contract staffing, temporary staffing, and flex staffing all refer to assignment-based work in which workers are supplied to clients for a period of time. The exact labels vary by company, industry vertical, and contract structure. Some firms call the same economic activity contract staffing. Others call it flex staffing, temporary help, staff augmentation, interim roles, or supplied labor.
For valuation purposes, labels matter less than economics. The appraiser should trace the actual general ledger categories, invoices, client contracts, job orders, payroll records, and gross profit reports. A revenue account labeled contract staffing may include short-term temporary assignments, long-term project staff augmentation, temp-to-hire arrangements, or on-site workforce management. Those subcategories can have different margins, assignment duration, collection risk, and buyer interest.
Kforce’s public filing is a helpful example of terminology. It describes temporary work as Flex and permanent placement as Direct Hire, while also noting its strategic focus on technology talent solutions (Kforce Inc., 2026). Robert Half separately discusses contract talent solutions and permanent placement talent solutions (Robert Half Inc., 2026). TrueBlue’s filing includes staffing businesses and also discusses permanent placement solution terminology in a public-company context (TrueBlue, Inc., 2026). These filings show that staffing companies can describe service lines differently, which is exactly why a private-company valuation should not rely on management labels alone.
For a contract staffing valuation, the appraiser should usually request revenue and gross profit by client, branch, job category, recruiter or account manager, worker type, and contract type. The appraiser should also review bill rates, pay rates, statutory burden, benefits, workers compensation, recruiter commissions, bad debt, and the timing between payroll and client collections. Gross billings can look impressive, but billings are not the same as gross profit, EBITDA, or free cash flow.
Permanent Placement, Direct Hire, Retained Search, and Professional Search
Permanent placement revenue usually comes from placing a candidate into a permanent role with a client. The fee structure may differ by agreement. Some placements are contingent on a completed hire. Some professional or retained search arrangements may include retainers, milestones, or other billing terms. Korn Ferry’s public filing discusses professional search and interim roles, including revenue-recognition concepts for contingent services and interim roles, which demonstrates that search and interim offerings can differ by contract structure (Korn Ferry, 2025).
Permanent placement revenue can be attractive because it may not require the staffing agency to fund weekly payroll for placed workers. In Kelly Services’ company-specific filing, permanent placement fees are described as typically having a higher gross margin than staffing services (Kelly Services, Inc., 2026). That point should be used carefully. It does not mean a permanent-placement agency is automatically worth more than a contract staffing agency. A placement boutique with high gross margin may still have volatile revenue, thin management depth, weak documentation, heavy owner dependence, or narrow client concentration.
The main valuation questions are about durability and transferability. How many recruiters generate material revenue? Are placements spread across repeat clients or concentrated in the owner? Are fee agreements signed and collectible? Are replacement guarantees or refunds material? Does the candidate database have practical value, or is revenue driven primarily by personal relationships? If a buyer cannot reasonably expect the revenue to continue after a transaction, a high historical gross margin may not translate into a high value.
Hybrid Models and Why Labels Can Mislead
Many agencies blend multiple services. A firm may provide contract staffing, temp-to-hire, direct hire, retained search, RPO, MSP support, project consulting, and interim professional services. ASGN’s public filing, for example, describes consulting, creative digital marketing, and permanent placement services in a larger technology solutions context, which is not directly comparable to a general local staffing agency (ASGN Incorporated, 2026). The lesson is not that a small agency should be valued like ASGN. The lesson is that the appraiser must understand the actual service mix before selecting comparable evidence.
A single revenue multiple, a single EBITDA multiple, or a single capitalization rate can obscure the economics of different revenue streams. A balanced platform may deserve a segmented analysis. Contract staffing revenue might be forecast from headcount, hours, bill rates, assignment retention, and working capital. Permanent placement revenue might be forecast from open job orders, recruiter productivity, placement conversion, client budgets, and guarantee claims. The combined valuation conclusion should reconcile those segments, not average away the differences.
Industry Context Helps, But It Is Not a Valuation Multiple
Staffing Demand and Temporary Help Data
Staffing industry demand is tied to broader labor markets. The American Staffing Association describes staffing, recruiting, and workforce solutions as a meaningful contributor to the U.S. economy and a source of job and career opportunities (American Staffing Association, n.d.-b). The ASA Staffing Index tracks weekly changes in temporary and contract employment, providing a trend indicator for staffing activity (American Staffing Association, n.d.-a). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics maintains the CES6056132001 series for “All employees, thousands, temporary help services, seasonally adjusted” (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, n.d.).
These sources can help frame industry conditions, but they do not tell an appraiser what a specific company is worth. A national temporary-help employment series is not a private-company EBITDA multiple. A weekly staffing index is not a substitute for client-level revenue retention, gross profit by service line, or accounts receivable diligence.
Contract Work and Search-Market Trends
The ASA and LinkedIn Economic Graph report on the state of staffing and search discusses contract roles, contractor-to-permanent conversion trends, and labor-market shifts based on LinkedIn data and staffing-industry context (American Staffing Association & LinkedIn Economic Graph, 2026). The report is useful because it supports the practical observation that contract work and permanent hiring do not always move in the same way. Employers may use contract labor for flexibility, while permanent placement demand may be more affected by hiring freezes or long-term headcount decisions.
A valuation should not convert this type of trend discussion into a forecast without company-specific support. If management projects strong contract staffing growth, the appraiser should test active assignments, signed orders, pipeline, fill rates, client budgets, redeployment rates, and historical forecast accuracy. If management projects a rebound in permanent placement fees, the appraiser should test open searches, recruiter capacity, repeat clients, signed fee agreements, historical conversion, and guarantee experience.
Caution: Market Data Is Not a Business Appraisal
Labor-market statistics, public-company filings, and M&A market updates can inform assumptions. They do not replace a business appraisal of the subject company. Professional valuation guidance and standards emphasize disciplined analysis, appropriate valuation methods, and support for assumptions (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2025; American Society of Appraisers, 2022; Internal Revenue Service, 2020; National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts, n.d.). For staffing agencies, that discipline starts with the company’s own revenue mix, gross profit, EBITDA, working capital, compliance risk, management depth, and transferability.
Revenue Quality: Gross Margin, EBITDA Quality, and Cash Conversion
Higher Gross Margin Does Not Automatically Mean Higher Value
Permanent placement can produce higher gross margin than staffing services in some company contexts, as Kelly Services explains in its public filing (Kelly Services, Inc., 2026). But gross margin alone is not value. A permanent placement firm with strong gross margin but inconsistent placements, a thin pipeline, and owner-controlled relationships may be riskier than a contract staffing business with stable assignments, repeat clients, careful collections, and diversified recruiters.
The reverse can also be true. A contract staffing agency may have recurring client activity, but if margins are thin, receivables are slow, payroll funding is tight, workers compensation claims are volatile, and one customer accounts for a large share of gross profit, the valuation may require meaningful risk adjustments. TrueBlue’s filing illustrates that revenue mix and workers compensation reserve adjustments can affect gross profit margin in a staffing business context (TrueBlue, Inc., 2026). ManpowerGroup’s filing provides another public-company example that permanent recruitment demand can influence gross profit margin (ManpowerGroup Inc., 2026).
A valuation professional therefore should not ask only, “Which revenue stream has the highest margin?” The better question is, “Which revenue stream produces durable, transferable, supportable cash flow after the costs and risks required to sustain it?”
Visual Aid 2: Gross Margin and EBITDA Quality Matrix
| Factor | Contract staffing signal | Permanent placement signal | Valuation implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue repeatability | Active assignments, renewal history, redeployment, average assignment length | Repeat client searches, retained work, signed fee agreements, pipeline conversion | More predictable revenue can support more reliable forecasts, but only with documentation |
| Gross margin | Bill-rate/pay-rate spread after payroll burden, benefits, workers comp, and direct costs | Placement fees may carry higher gross margin in some contexts | Margin must be tested against SG&A, recruiter costs, owner dependence, refunds, and cyclicality |
| Working capital | Payroll often occurs before client collections; A/R and funding lines matter | Lower direct payroll funding, but collection disputes or guarantee claims may matter | Cash conversion can change enterprise value, equity value, and deal terms |
| Compliance risk | Payroll taxes, classification, wage/hour, safety, workers compensation, client-site controls | Fee agreements, candidate representations, guarantee terms, recruiter agreements | Risk can affect normalized EBITDA, discount rates, and buyer appetite |
| Key-person risk | Branch managers, account managers, recruiters, and client relationship owners may be important | Top recruiters, researchers, or owner-producers may dominate production | Transferability affects forecast confidence and risk assessment |
| Client concentration | Large recurring clients may stabilize assignments but increase dependence | A few hiring managers or companies may drive placement fees | Concentration can affect DCF assumptions, market comparability, and deal structure |
Revenue Quality Questions the Appraiser Should Answer
A staffing agency valuation should include a focused revenue-quality review. Useful questions include:
- What percentage of revenue and gross profit comes from contract staffing, temporary staffing, direct hire, retained search, RPO/MSP, consulting, interim work, and other services?
- Does management track gross profit by client, vertical, branch, recruiter, account manager, and revenue model?
- Are gross billings being mistaken for value, even though direct labor costs and burden may be substantial?
- Are placements concentrated in a few recruiters or repeat client relationships?
- Are contract staffing hours recurring, seasonal, project-based, or dependent on a single customer budget?
- How quickly does the agency collect receivables compared with payroll timing?
- Are workers compensation reserves, payroll taxes, benefits, and safety costs properly accrued?
- Are placement fees subject to replacement guarantees, refunds, disputes, or delayed collection?
- Are client contracts transferable in a transaction?
- Are MSP or VMS terms affecting pricing, collections, and client control?
These questions help connect revenue quality to normalized EBITDA and cash flow.
Contract Staffing Valuation Drivers
Bill-Rate/Pay-Rate Spread and Burden Analysis
Contract staffing economics begin with the spread between what the client pays and what the worker costs. The worker cost is not just the pay rate. Depending on the facts, it may include payroll taxes, benefits, workers compensation, paid time off, insurance, onboarding, background checks, credentialing, recruiter commissions, and other direct assignment costs. The appraiser should use the company’s actual records rather than unsupported industry benchmarks.
Visual Aid 3: Simplified Contract Staffing Gross Profit Formula
Contract staffing gross profit, simplified:
Billable hours
x Average client bill rate
= Gross billings
minus Billable hours x average worker pay rate
minus Payroll taxes, benefits, workers compensation, insurance, and direct assignment costs
= Contract staffing gross profit before branch SG&A
Then:
Contract staffing gross profit
minus Sustainable branch, recruiting, sales, technology, and administrative costs
= Contribution to normalized EBITDA before company-level adjustments
This is an analytical framework, not a required accounting presentation. The key point is that the valuation should not treat all revenue dollars equally. A dollar of contract staffing gross billings includes a direct labor component. A dollar of permanent placement fee revenue may have different direct costs and risk. EBITDA and cash flow analysis should reflect those differences.
Assignment Duration, Redeployment, Fill Rates, and Client Retention
A contract staffing firm with long assignments, repeat clients, high redeployment, and stable margins may produce more forecastable cash flow than one with short assignments and constant churn. Assignment duration matters because it affects recruiting effort and revenue visibility. Redeployment matters because a worker who rolls from one assignment to another can reduce recruiting cost and stabilize gross profit. Fill rates matter because unfilled orders are not revenue.
Client retention should be tested at the gross profit level, not just revenue. A client that generates high billings but low spread, slow payment, and high administrative burden may not be as valuable as a smaller client with reliable collections and better contribution margin. The appraiser should review client-level gross profit, receivables aging, contract terms, and historical continuity.
Payroll Funding, Receivables, and Working Capital
Contract staffing agencies often pay workers before clients pay invoices. That timing difference makes working capital central to staffing agency valuations. A business can report positive EBITDA while still requiring substantial cash to fund payroll and receivables growth. The appraiser should review days sales outstanding, A/R aging, subsequent collections, bad debt, factoring arrangements, payroll funding lines, borrowing-base certificates, and customer credit quality.
For transaction-related valuations, the distinction between enterprise value and equity value is important. Enterprise value may reflect the operating business on a cash-free, debt-free basis, while equity value may change after debt, cash, working-capital targets, and debt-like items are considered. A staffing agency that relies on factoring or payroll funding may need careful treatment of debt-like obligations and normal working capital.
Safety, Workers Compensation, and Host-Employer Risk
OSHA’s temporary-worker guidance explains that workers employed through staffing agencies are generally temporary or supplied workers and that temporary workers are supplied to a host employer and paid by a staffing agency (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, n.d.). OSHA also emphasizes that all workers have a right to a safe and healthy workplace and that staffing agencies and host employers have safety-related responsibilities in temporary-worker arrangements (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, n.d.).
For valuation purposes, this is a risk and diligence issue, not legal advice. The appraiser, buyer, or lender should review workers compensation loss runs, safety incident history, client-site risk controls, insurance policies, reserve analyses, OSHA-related records if applicable, and contractual responsibility between the staffing agency and host employer. High workers compensation costs, inadequate safety procedures, or unpriced client-site risk can affect normalized earnings and perceived risk.
Worker Classification and Payroll-Tax Diligence
The IRS worker classification page states that before a business can determine how to treat payments for services, it must know the business relationship that exists between the business and the person performing services; the page identifies categories such as independent contractor and employee (Internal Revenue Service, n.d.). Staffing agencies that use independent contractors, freelancers, subcontractors, outsourced payroll structures, or mixed worker models should review classification and payroll-tax questions with qualified advisers.
In a valuation, classification risk may affect normalized EBITDA, contingent liabilities, required reserves, and buyer appetite. The article is not tax or legal advice. Owners should consult their CPA, employment counsel, tax adviser, or other qualified professional for company-specific classification and payroll-tax analysis.
Permanent Placement Valuation Drivers
Placement-Fee Economics and Timing
Permanent placement revenue is often tied to completed placements. The amount and timing depend on the agreement. Some fees may be contingent on a candidate starting employment. Some search arrangements may involve retainers or milestones. Some agreements may include replacement or refund terms. The appraiser should not assume a standard fee percentage or standard guarantee period unless the company’s contracts prove it.
The valuation should test placement volume, average fee, fee collection history, open job orders, signed agreements, recruiter capacity, client repeat rate, and candidate pipeline. Permanent placement revenue can be attractive when it is supported by repeat clients, diversified recruiters, documented fee agreements, and a durable recruiting process. It can be risky when revenue comes from a few one-off searches or from relationships that may not transfer to a buyer.
Recruiter Productivity and Key-Person Dependency
Recruiter productivity is central to permanent placement value. A placement boutique with five productive recruiters and documented repeat-client relationships may be more transferable than a firm where the owner generates most placements personally. The appraiser should analyze placements by recruiter, gross profit by recruiter, commission plans, recruiter tenure, client ownership, candidate database use, non-solicitation agreements where applicable, turnover history, and the recruiting process.
Key-person risk is not limited to the owner. A single senior recruiter, branch leader, or niche market specialist can drive a large share of revenue. If that person leaves, clients and candidates may leave too. A valuation professional may address this risk through forecast adjustments, discount or capitalization rate selection, scenario analysis, method weighting, or qualitative risk discussion, depending on the engagement and standard of value.
Cyclicality and Hiring Freezes
Permanent placement is often tied to employers’ willingness to add permanent headcount. In uncertain labor markets, clients may delay hiring, shift to contract labor, or reduce search budgets. ManpowerGroup’s public filing supports the idea that permanent recruitment demand can influence gross profit margin in a staffing and workforce solutions context (ManpowerGroup Inc., 2026). The ASA/LinkedIn report discusses how contract roles and hiring patterns changed in a broader labor-market context (American Staffing Association & LinkedIn Economic Graph, 2026).
A valuation should therefore test permanent placement forecasts under scenarios. What happens if clients delay searches? What happens if time-to-fill lengthens? What happens if recruiter turnover increases? What happens if guarantee claims rise? Scenario testing is especially important when the most recent year includes an unusually large placement project, a post-downturn rebound, or a client-specific hiring surge.
Refunds, Replacement Guarantees, and Revenue Quality
Permanent placement agreements may include replacement or refund provisions. The appraiser should request the actual agreements and review historical fall-offs, guarantee claims, refunds, write-offs, fee disputes, and collection patterns. A placement fee that is earned but not collected, or that is subject to a material replacement obligation, may not have the same quality as cash collected from repeat clients with low fall-off history.
Revenue recognition can also vary by contract structure. Korn Ferry’s public filing discusses revenue-recognition concepts for contingent services and interim roles in its own context (Korn Ferry, 2025). For a private-company valuation, the appraiser should coordinate with the company’s CPA when accounting treatment affects reported earnings, but the valuation conclusion should focus on sustainable economic benefit and risk.
Normalized EBITDA for a Staffing Agency
Why EBITDA Normalization Is Central But Not Mechanical
EBITDA is commonly used in private-company valuation discussions, but it is not a value conclusion by itself. In staffing agency valuations, normalized EBITDA should reflect sustainable revenue mix, gross profit, direct labor costs, recruiter and sales capacity, owner compensation, working-capital requirements, bad debt, compliance exposure, and nonrecurring items. IRS business valuation guidance discusses analyzing historical financial statements and, when necessary, adjusting them to reflect the appropriate benefit stream for the selected methodology (Internal Revenue Service, 2020).
Professional standards and guidance also matter. AICPA VS Section 100 provides a valuation services framework for AICPA members (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2025). NACVA maintains professional standards and ethics resources for valuation professionals (National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts, n.d.). ASA’s Business Valuation Standards address business valuation practice, including income and market approach standards in the published standards document (American Society of Appraisers, 2022). These sources do not provide staffing-agency pricing formulas. They support disciplined analysis and reporting.
Visual Aid 4: Normalized EBITDA Bridge for Staffing Agencies
| Adjustment category | Evidence to request | Contract staffing relevance | Permanent placement relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner compensation normalization | Payroll records, job descriptions, actual duties, replacement compensation analysis | Owner may manage branches, client relationships, credit lines, or sales | Owner may be the top recruiter, search consultant, or rainmaker |
| Nonrecurring revenue or expense | General ledger detail, invoices, management explanations, board or adviser records | One-time client loss, unusual bad debt, unusual workers comp adjustment | One-time large search project, unusual placement spike, isolated refund event |
| Payroll burden and workers compensation | Payroll tax filings, carrier statements, loss runs, burden reconciliations | Directly affects gross profit and risk | Less direct unless interim or contract labor is part of the model |
| Bad debt and A/R collectability | A/R aging, subsequent collections, write-off history, customer credit notes | Critical because payroll may have already been funded | Important for fee collection, disputes, and guarantee claims |
| Recruiter and sales capacity | Headcount schedule, commission plans, production by recruiter, turnover | Recruiters and account managers drive fills and redeployment | Recruiter productivity often drives placement revenue |
| Related-party expenses | Lease agreements, related-party services, owner reimbursements | May affect branch-level profitability | May affect reported EBITDA and transferability |
| Legal, tax, or compliance exposure | Adviser memos, claims, audits, contracts, insurance records | Classification, safety, payroll, wage/hour, workers comp | Fee disputes, guarantee terms, recruiter agreements |
| Technology and systems | ATS/CRM contracts, payroll system, integrations, data quality | Supports scaling assignments, time capture, invoicing, compliance | Supports candidate database, pipeline tracking, client follow-up |
EBITDA Quality Questions by Revenue Model
For contract staffing, important EBITDA questions include:
- Is gross profit stable by client, branch, vertical, and worker type?
- Are hours, bill rates, and assignment durations recurring or project-based?
- Are margins compressed by MSP or VMS terms?
- Are payroll taxes, benefits, insurance, and workers compensation fully accrued?
- How old are receivables, and how much bad debt is recurring?
- Are factoring costs or funding fees treated consistently?
- Are workers compensation reserves and safety costs normalized?
For permanent placement, important EBITDA questions include:
- How many recruiters produce material revenue?
- What share of placement fees comes from repeat clients?
- What share is retained search, contingent direct hire, professional search, or interim work?
- What refund, replacement, or guarantee obligations exist?
- Is revenue concentrated in the owner or a few producer relationships?
- How much SG&A is required to sustain recruiting capacity?
- Are unusually large placements or one-time client projects normalized appropriately?
The goal is not to maximize adjusted EBITDA. The goal is to estimate sustainable economic benefit consistent with the valuation purpose, standard of value, and selected valuation methods.
Valuation Methods for Staffing Agencies
Income Approach and Discounted Cash Flow
The income approach is often useful for staffing agencies because it can connect revenue mix to expected cash flow. A discounted cash flow model can forecast contract staffing and permanent placement revenue separately, then apply segment-specific assumptions for gross profit, SG&A, working capital, taxes, growth, and risk. IRS business valuation guidance identifies the income approach as one of the generally accepted approaches and emphasizes consistency between the selected benefit stream and discount or capitalization rate (Internal Revenue Service, 2020).
A DCF is not automatically better than every other method. It is only as good as its assumptions. But when a company has materially different revenue streams, a segmented DCF can be more informative than a single blended multiple. Contract staffing revenue may be forecast from billable hours, active headcount, assignment duration, bill rates, pay rates, burden, client retention, and A/R timing. Permanent placement revenue may be forecast from searches, placements, fee agreements, recruiter productivity, repeat clients, and guarantee claims.
Visual Aid 5: DCF Driver Table by Revenue Stream
| DCF driver | Contract staffing model input | Permanent placement model input | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue volume | Billable hours, contractors on assignment, average assignment duration, fill rates | Number of placements, retained searches, direct-hire orders, recruiter capacity | Drives forecasted gross billings and fee revenue |
| Pricing | Bill rates, spread by client or skill set, contractual pricing terms | Fee agreements, retained milestones, average collected fee | Determines gross profit potential |
| Direct costs | Pay rates, payroll taxes, benefits, workers compensation, screening, onboarding | Recruiter commissions, guarantee/refund exposure, delivery costs | Converts revenue into gross profit |
| SG&A capacity | Recruiters, account managers, branch managers, payroll, billing, technology | Recruiters, researchers, sales leadership, marketing, technology | Determines sustainable EBITDA |
| Working capital | A/R days, payroll timing, factoring, funding lines, credit terms | Fee collection timing, refund reserves, disputes | Converts EBITDA into cash flow |
| Risk | Client concentration, safety, classification, margin pressure, funding exposure | Cyclicality, recruiter concentration, owner dependence, pipeline volatility | Affects discount or capitalization rates |
| Terminal value | Sustainable contractor base, client retention, diversified assignments | Repeat-client pipeline, scalable recruiter platform, documented process | Avoids overvaluing temporary spikes |
Visual Aid 6: Segmented Staffing DCF Modeling Prompt
Segmented staffing valuation model, simplified:
1. Forecast contract staffing gross profit from:
- billable hours,
- bill rates,
- pay rates,
- payroll burden,
- workers compensation,
- assignment retention,
- client retention,
- and expected A/R timing.
2. Forecast permanent placement gross profit from:
- expected placements,
- fee agreements,
- recruiter capacity,
- repeat-client demand,
- retained versus contingent mix,
- and replacement/refund assumptions.
3. Deduct sustainable SG&A needed to support both revenue streams.
4. Adjust for taxes, capital expenditures, and working capital as appropriate.
5. Apply a discount rate or capitalization rate consistent with the forecasted benefit stream and company-specific risk.
6. Reconcile the DCF result with market evidence and balance-sheet analysis.
This framework is not a rule mandated by the IRS, ASA, AICPA, or NACVA. It is a practical way to make sure the forecast reflects the economics of the staffing agency being valued.
Market Approach
The market approach can be useful when there is reliable evidence from comparable transactions or public companies. The challenge is comparability. A healthcare staffing platform, a light industrial branch network, an IT staff augmentation firm, an executive search boutique, and an RPO provider may all appear in human capital management market updates, but they are not interchangeable.
Market sources from investment banks and advisory firms can help describe M&A conditions and buyer interest. They should not be treated as universal private-company pricing rules. If a source-specific range or transaction statistic is used, it should be attributed with its date, segment, company size, geography, sample limitations, and source type. For this article, broad multiples are intentionally omitted because the accuracy risk is high and the better owner takeaway is methodological: comparable evidence must be comparable.
Visual Aid 7: Market Approach Comparability Checklist
| Comparability item | Why it matters | Contract-heavy agency issue | Placement-heavy agency issue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue mix | Multiples reflect the economics and risk of the actual model | Gross billings may not be comparable to net-fee or search businesses | Placement fees may be high margin but volatile |
| Vertical specialization | Healthcare, IT, industrial, clerical, finance, and executive search differ | Safety, credentialing, VMS/MSP, wage burden, and fill rates vary | Demand cycles and recruiter specialization vary |
| Size and EBITDA | Larger platforms may attract different buyers than small agencies | Branch scale and funding capacity matter | Recruiter bench and management depth matter |
| Growth and retention | Buyers pay for durable cash flow, not just a recent spike | Assignment renewal and redeployment matter | Repeat clients and pipeline conversion matter |
| Gross margin and EBITDA quality | Similar revenue can produce different cash flow | Burden, workers comp, A/R, and bad debt can erode value | Key recruiters, fall-offs, and refunds can erode value |
| Client concentration | Concentrated relationships can increase risk | One large contract staffing customer may dominate hours and A/R | One hiring manager or client may dominate placements |
| Deal structure | Earnouts, seller notes, and working-capital targets may bridge risk | Payroll funding and A/R create closing complexity | Placement volatility can push contingent consideration |
| Data quality | Weak accounting can impair reliability | Missing burden or A/R detail can overstate EBITDA | Missing production data can overstate transferability |
Asset Approach and Balance-Sheet Cleanup
The asset approach may not capture all goodwill for a profitable staffing agency with durable client relationships and sustainable earnings. Still, it is important. Staffing agencies can have meaningful working-capital and debt-like issues. Accounts receivable may be large because payroll has been paid before customers collect. Payroll liabilities, payroll taxes, workers compensation reserves, factoring lines, debt, client deposits, deferred revenue, and related-party balances can all affect equity value.
IRS guidance recognizes the asset-based approach as one of the generally accepted valuation approaches, with professional judgment used in selecting the appropriate method or methods (Internal Revenue Service, 2020). For staffing agencies, the asset approach often functions as a balance-sheet quality review and a bridge from enterprise value to equity value.
Visual Aid 8: Asset Approach and Working-Capital Cleanup Checklist
| Balance-sheet item | Why it matters in staffing agency valuations | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts receivable | Payroll may have already been funded before client collection | A/R aging, write-off history, top customer balances, subsequent collections |
| Payroll liabilities | Underaccrued payroll or taxes can overstate value | Payroll registers, tax filings, accrual reconciliations |
| Workers compensation reserves | Loss history can affect normalized earnings and liabilities | Loss runs, carrier statements, claims history, reserve analysis |
| Factoring or payroll funding lines | Debt-like obligations can affect equity value and closing proceeds | Credit agreements, factoring statements, borrowing-base certificates |
| Client deposits or deferred revenue | May create obligations not visible in EBITDA | Contract review, deferred revenue schedule |
| Nonoperating assets | Cash, investments, vehicles, or assets not needed for operations may require separate treatment | Bank statements, fixed asset register, management interviews |
| Software and candidate databases | ATS/CRM and candidate data may support operations, but value depends on transferability and use | Software contracts, user metrics, data quality, privacy review |
| Related-party balances | Related-party receivables, payables, leases, or services may distort value | Agreements, payment history, market terms analysis |
Reconcile Methods by Agency Type
Contract-Heavy Staffing Agency
For a contract-heavy staffing agency, the income approach may receive significant weight if assignments, customers, margins, and collections are forecastable. The appraiser should pay particular attention to bill-rate/pay-rate spread, assignment duration, redeployment, active orders, client retention, workers compensation, safety controls, payroll funding, A/R quality, and client concentration.
The market approach can be used only if comparable evidence reflects similar vertical specialization, size, revenue mix, gross margin, growth, and risk. Public-company filings can explain terminology, but they should not be mechanically applied as small-company multiples. The asset approach should be used to understand receivables, payroll liabilities, debt-like items, funding lines, and nonoperating assets.
Permanent-Placement Boutique
For a permanent-placement boutique, the income approach should test repeatability of placement fees, recruiter productivity, repeat clients, guarantee exposure, and cyclicality. The appraiser should distinguish retained search, contingent direct hire, professional search, executive search, and interim role economics where the company tracks them.
The market approach may be difficult if the business depends heavily on the owner or a narrow niche. A boutique that looks profitable on historical EBITDA may deserve a higher risk assessment if clients and candidates are tied to one person’s relationships. The asset approach may be less important for tangible assets, but receivables, fee disputes, working capital, technology, and contingent liabilities still matter.
Balanced Staffing and Placement Platform
A balanced agency should be analyzed by service line. The appraiser should segment revenue and gross profit into contract staffing, direct hire, retained search, RPO/MSP, consulting, interim work, and other categories. Diversification can reduce some risk, but only when financial reporting, client relationships, recruiter capacity, compliance, systems, and management depth support the mix.
A balanced platform may justify a blended conclusion after segment analysis, but the blend should be documented. The appraiser should explain how each method was weighted and why the conclusion reflects the company’s actual economics.
Visual Aid 9: Valuation Decision Tree
Practical Case Studies
The following examples are hypothetical. They are designed to show process and risk, not to provide multiples or pricing rules.
Case Study 1: Contract-Heavy IT Staffing Firm
Agency A provides IT contract professionals to mid-market and enterprise clients. Most gross profit comes from long-term contract assignments. The company has a strong applicant tracking system, documented client contracts, and several repeat clients. Its revenue looks recurring because contractors stay on assignment for meaningful periods and some workers are redeployed after projects end.
The valuation strengths are revenue visibility, specialized skill sets, and repeat enterprise relationships. The concerns are customer concentration, MSP terms, consultant churn, and accounts receivable. If one enterprise client accounts for a large share of gross profit and receivables, the appraiser should not treat the revenue as diversified just because the agency has many contractors.
The likely analytical emphasis is a segmented DCF, contract gross profit quality, A/R and working-capital analysis, and market approach cross-checks only if comparable evidence reflects similar IT staffing economics. EBITDA normalization should include recruiter and account management capacity needed to sustain assignments.
Case Study 2: Owner-Led Permanent Placement Boutique
Agency B is a professional placement boutique in a narrow niche. It reports strong gross margin and low direct payroll costs. The owner personally maintains most client relationships and closes many placements. The company has a good reputation but limited written process documentation and uneven monthly revenue.
The valuation strengths are high gross margin, specialized expertise, and repeat client relationships. The concerns are owner dependence, hiring-cycle sensitivity, guarantee exposure, and revenue transferability. A buyer may question whether clients will continue to use the firm if the owner exits.
The likely analytical emphasis is a DCF or capitalized earnings method with careful risk assessment, recruiter productivity analysis, client retention support, and owner compensation normalization. The appraiser may also consider a scenario in which some owner-driven revenue declines or requires replacement business development cost.
Case Study 3: Balanced Healthcare and Commercial Staffing Firm
Agency C provides a mix of long-term temporary staffing, direct hire, and contract-to-hire services across healthcare and commercial clients. It has multiple recruiters, documented onboarding procedures, and recurring clients. It also has workers compensation exposure, credentialing requirements, and some client concentration.
The valuation strengths are diversified service lines and repeat client demand. The concerns are workers compensation, credentialing, safety, gross-margin mix, recruiter turnover, and receivables. The appraiser should separate healthcare and commercial staffing, contract assignments and direct hire, and recurring clients and one-time searches.
The likely analytical emphasis is a segmented forecast, compliance risk review, working-capital cleanup, and a careful reconciliation of income approach and market approach evidence.
Visual Aid 10: Hypothetical Agency Comparison Table
| Hypothetical agency | Revenue mix | Main valuation strengths | Main valuation concerns | Likely analytical emphasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency A: contract-heavy IT staffing firm | Most gross profit from long-term contract professionals | Repeat clients, specialized skills, forecastable assignments | A/R concentration, MSP terms, customer concentration, consultant churn | Segmented DCF, contract gross profit quality, market cross-check if comparable |
| Agency B: owner-led permanent placement boutique | Most revenue from direct-hire searches in a narrow niche | High gross margin, strong relationships, limited payroll funding | Owner dependence, volatile monthly revenue, guarantee exposure | DCF or capitalized earnings with key-person and revenue durability analysis |
| Agency C: balanced healthcare and commercial staffing firm | Mix of temporary, long-term assignments, and direct hire | Diversification, repeat clients, multiple recruiters | Workers compensation, credentialing, safety, gross-margin mix, recruiter turnover | Separate forecast by service line, compliance risk review, working-capital cleanup |
Due Diligence Checklist Before Valuing or Selling a Staffing Agency
A staffing agency owner can make the valuation process more efficient by preparing clean, segment-level information. The goal is not to dress up the company. The goal is to provide evidence that supports a credible business valuation.
Visual Aid 11: 90-Day Valuation Preparation Checklist
| Preparation item | What to collect | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Segment financials | Revenue, gross profit, and EBITDA by contract staffing, direct hire, retained search, RPO/MSP, and consulting | Prevents unlike revenue streams from being valued as one pool |
| Gross margin reports | Bill rate, pay rate, burden, workers comp, recruiter commissions, client-level gross profit | Shows sustainable spread and EBITDA quality |
| Client concentration | Top clients by revenue, gross profit, A/R, and contract terms | Concentration affects risk, forecast reliability, and market comparability |
| Recruiter productivity | Placements, fills, gross profit, commission plans, tenure, turnover | Essential for permanent placement and direct hire value |
| A/R and working capital | Aging, write-offs, subsequent collections, funding lines | Cash conversion and debt-like items affect equity value |
| Contracts and legal files | Client MSAs, MSP/VMS terms, placement agreements, guarantee terms, disputes | Determines transferability, pricing, and contingent exposure |
| Compliance records | Payroll tax records, classification policies, OSHA/safety files, workers comp loss runs | Compliance risk can affect forecast and risk assessment |
| Management continuity | Organization chart, branch managers, recruiters, succession plan | Lower owner dependency may improve durability |
| Technology and data | ATS/CRM reports, candidate database metrics, payroll and billing systems | Supports scalability and transferability claims |
| Forecast support | Active orders, signed searches, pipeline, historical forecast accuracy | Helps test management projections |
Common Staffing Agency Valuation Mistakes
Mistake 1: Valuing Gross Billings as if They Were Gross Profit
Contract staffing gross billings can include substantial worker pay and burden. Valuing gross billings without understanding the spread can overstate economics. The appraiser should focus on gross profit, EBITDA, cash flow, and working capital.
Mistake 2: Treating Direct Hire and Contract Staffing Revenue as Equally Recurring
Direct hire revenue may come from repeat clients, but it is still tied to hiring activity and completed placements. Contract staffing revenue may have assignment-level continuity, but assignments can end and clients can reduce hours. Each stream needs its own retention analysis.
Mistake 3: Assuming Permanent Placement Is Always More Valuable Because Gross Margin Can Be Higher
Higher gross margin does not automatically mean higher value. A permanent placement firm may be riskier if revenue is volatile, owner-dependent, or poorly documented. A contract staffing firm may be more valuable if cash flows are durable and transferable.
Mistake 4: Ignoring Payroll Funding and Accounts Receivable Timing
A contract staffing agency can grow EBITDA while consuming cash if receivables grow faster than collections. Funding costs, factoring, bad debt, and working-capital targets should be reviewed carefully.
Mistake 5: Ignoring Workers Compensation, Safety, and Classification Risk
OSHA temporary-worker guidance and IRS worker classification guidance are reminders that staffing agencies can have operational and compliance risks that affect value (Internal Revenue Service, n.d.; Occupational Safety and Health Administration, n.d.). The valuation should not provide legal or tax advice, but it should identify risk areas for adviser review.
Mistake 6: Applying Public-Company Margins or Multiples Directly to a Private Staffing Agency
Public-company filings are valuable sources for terminology and business-model mechanics. They are not direct evidence that a privately held agency deserves the same margin, growth, risk profile, or valuation multiple.
Mistake 7: Using Market Reports as Universal Pricing Rules
M&A market updates may describe activity and buyer sentiment, but they are not valuation standards. Any market evidence should be tested for segment, size, geography, date, sample, source, and comparability.
Mistake 8: Adding Back Owner Compensation Without Considering Replacement Cost
If the owner works as a recruiter, salesperson, branch manager, or finance leader, the company may need a replacement employee after the owner leaves. Normalized EBITDA should reflect sustainable operations, not just maximum add-backs.
Mistake 9: Ignoring Recruiter Concentration
A direct-hire firm with revenue concentrated in two recruiters may be riskier than its top-line performance suggests. Recruiter turnover, enforceability of agreements, candidate database ownership, and client relationship transferability should be reviewed with qualified advisers.
Mistake 10: Forgetting the Balance Sheet
A staffing agency’s value is not only an income statement question. A/R, payroll liabilities, workers compensation reserves, funding lines, debt, and nonoperating assets can affect equity value and deal proceeds.
How Simply Business Valuation Can Help
If you are buying, selling, financing, or planning around a staffing agency, Simply Business Valuation can help prepare a defensible business valuation that separates contract staffing, direct hire, permanent placement, and other revenue streams before applying the appropriate valuation methods. A staffing agency business appraisal should not rely on a generic online multiple. It should evaluate normalized EBITDA, discounted cash flow assumptions, market approach comparability, asset approach adjustments, revenue quality, working capital, and company-specific risk.
For owners, a valuation can help identify value drivers before a sale, partner buyout, succession plan, financing request, or shareholder dispute. For buyers and lenders, a valuation can help test the sustainability of earnings, the quality of receivables, and the risks behind revenue mix. For CPAs and attorneys, a valuation can provide a structured framework for discussing earnings normalization, documentation, and assumptions.
A professional valuation does not replace legal, tax, employment, insurance, or compliance advice. Staffing agencies should consult their CPA, attorney, employment counsel, insurance adviser, and other qualified professionals for company-specific questions involving worker classification, payroll taxes, safety, contracts, or transaction structure.
FAQ: Staffing Agency Valuations
1. Are contract staffing agencies valued differently from permanent placement firms?
Yes. Contract staffing and permanent placement agencies are valued differently because their cash-flow drivers differ. Contract staffing depends on billable hours, bill rates, pay rates, payroll burden, assignment retention, A/R, and funding needs. Permanent placement depends on completed placements, recruiter productivity, client hiring demand, fee agreements, guarantee terms, and repeat relationships. The valuation should segment the revenue streams before applying valuation methods.
2. Is permanent placement revenue more valuable because gross margins can be higher?
Not automatically. Kelly Services states in its company-specific public filing that permanent placement fees typically have a higher gross margin than staffing services, but that does not mean every permanent placement firm is worth more than every contract staffing firm (Kelly Services, Inc., 2026). Value still depends on durability, transferability, normalized EBITDA, working capital, growth, and risk.
3. What is the most important metric for valuing a staffing agency?
There is no single metric. Normalized EBITDA is important, but so are gross profit by revenue stream, client retention, recruiter productivity, A/R quality, working capital, customer concentration, compliance risk, and management depth. A credible business valuation looks at the full economic picture.
4. Should a staffing agency be valued on revenue or EBITDA?
Revenue alone is usually insufficient, especially for contract staffing businesses where gross billings include large direct labor costs. EBITDA and cash flow need to be normalized, and market evidence must be comparable. Revenue can be useful as context, but it should not be used blindly.
5. How does discounted cash flow apply to staffing agency valuations?
A discounted cash flow model can forecast contract staffing and permanent placement revenue separately, then apply segment-specific assumptions for gross profit, SG&A, working capital, growth, and risk. This is useful when the agency has different service lines with different cash-flow profiles.
6. When is the market approach useful for staffing agencies?
The market approach is useful when comparable companies or transactions share similar revenue mix, vertical specialization, size, margin, growth, customer concentration, management depth, and risk. If the market evidence is not comparable, it can mislead the valuation.
7. Does the asset approach matter if a staffing agency is profitable?
Yes. The asset approach may not capture all goodwill for a profitable agency, but it is still important for reviewing accounts receivable, payroll liabilities, workers compensation reserves, debt, factoring lines, and nonoperating assets. Those items can affect equity value and transaction proceeds.
8. How do accounts receivable affect a staffing agency valuation?
Contract staffing agencies often pay workers before collecting from clients. If receivables are slow, concentrated, disputed, or heavily factored, cash flow and equity value can be affected. A/R aging, subsequent collections, bad debt, and funding arrangements should be reviewed.
9. How does worker classification risk affect value?
Worker classification risk can affect payroll taxes, compliance exposure, financial statements, and buyer confidence. IRS worker classification guidance explains that the business relationship between the service provider and the business is central to determining how payments should be treated (Internal Revenue Service, n.d.). Owners should consult qualified tax and legal advisers.
10. How does temporary-worker safety affect a valuation?
OSHA’s temporary-worker guidance supports treating safety and host-employer coordination as important diligence topics (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, n.d.). Safety history, workers compensation claims, and client-site risk controls can affect normalized earnings and perceived risk.
11. What documents should I prepare before a staffing agency business appraisal?
Prepare financial statements, tax returns, segment revenue and gross profit reports, bill-rate/pay-rate data, payroll burden analysis, A/R aging, client contracts, placement agreements, recruiter productivity reports, workers compensation loss runs, safety records, funding agreements, and management organization charts.
12. How does owner dependency affect a permanent placement firm?
If the owner is the primary recruiter, rainmaker, or client relationship holder, a buyer may view revenue as less transferable. The valuation may need to consider replacement compensation, revenue retention risk, client transferability, and the depth of the recruiting team.
13. Can public staffing company filings be used to value a small private agency?
They can help explain terminology, service-line mechanics, gross-margin concepts, and risk factors, but they are not direct private-company multiple evidence. A private agency’s valuation should be based on its own financials, clients, recruiters, working capital, risk, and comparable market evidence where available.
14. Why should I use a professional business valuation instead of an online multiple?
Staffing agencies differ by revenue mix, gross margin, client concentration, recruiter productivity, working capital, compliance risk, and management depth. A professional business appraisal documents the valuation methods, assumptions, normalization adjustments, and evidence behind the value conclusion.
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2025). Statement on Standards for Valuation Services (VS Section 100). AICPA & CIMA. https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/download/statement-on-standards-for-valuation-services-vs-section-100
American Society of Appraisers. (2022). ASA business valuation standards. https://www.appraisers.org/docs/default-source/5---standards/bv-standards-feb-2022.pdf
American Staffing Association. (n.d.-a). ASA Staffing Index. https://americanstaffing.net/research/asa-data-dashboard/asa-staffing-index/
American Staffing Association. (n.d.-b). Staffing industry statistics. https://americanstaffing.net/research/fact-sheets-analysis-staffing-industry-trends/staffing-industry-statistics/
American Staffing Association & LinkedIn Economic Graph. (2026). The state of staffing & search. https://economicgraph.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/economicgraph/en-us/PDF/asa-linkedIn-state-of-staffing-report-jan-2026.pdf
ASGN Incorporated. (2026). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/890564/000089056426000013/asgn-20251231.htm
Internal Revenue Service. (2020). Internal Revenue Manual 4.48.4, Business valuation guidelines. https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-048-004
Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.). Independent contractor (self-employed) or employee? https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/independent-contractor-self-employed-or-employee
Kelly Services, Inc. (2026). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/55135/000005513526000053/kelya-20251228.htm
Kforce Inc. (2026). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/930420/000093042026000007/kfrc-20251231.htm
Korn Ferry. (2025). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/56679/000162828025033260/kfy-20250430.htm
ManpowerGroup Inc. (2026). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/871763/000119312526064113/man-20251231.htm
National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts. (n.d.). Professional standards and ethics. https://www.nacva.com/standards
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Protecting temporary workers. https://www.osha.gov/temporaryworkers
Robert Half Inc. (2026). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/315213/000031521326000006/rhi-20251231.htm
TrueBlue, Inc. (2026). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/768899/000076889926000009/tbi-20251228.htm
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). All employees, thousands, temporary help services, seasonally adjusted, CES6056132001. https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES6056132001